<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.39 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.39

# 四明尊者教行錄 3.39

四明尊者教行錄 3.39

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.39)

涅槃一實諦，遮顯非殊致，  
依言及離言，悉是真如義。  
此俗洎此真，非情是隨智，  
二諦皆名真，此真有名字。  
若了性三千，此是圓成義，  
法法盡真常，名實皆尊貴。  
依此偏計法，如何得為類？  
其體若空華，何實當名字？  
心色體無二，情中堅執異，  
欲破堅執情，須推到邊際。  
若知依理藏，法法無遺棄，  
寄此顯圓常，何曾求遠離？  
雖是一精明，體具三千義，  
依正理內含，根境性中備。  
唯心即唯色，唯香亦唯味，  
唯觸唯是音，此理好思議。  
水火力相傾，明暗能更治，  
即此相違中，彌見相從意。  
相違彰具德，相從表不二，  
智者善思量，本末何曾異？  
觀心理趣深，乍似相違義，  
出自旋總持，誰當不猶豫？  
濫作流通人，自省居何位，  
片言難折獄，再思方可矣。  
九界約修心，三道寄心治，  
此從外境觀，外破內方著。  
約理雖相合，據迷且分二，  
究竟知所以，敢將情力置。  
三法皆稱妙，唯心最玄祕，  
於心見法界，生佛齊一致。  
迷己逐他物，確爾立情器，  
見色便見心，灼然全性起。

> In the Nirvāṇa \[Sūtra\], the one real truth does not differ in its negative and positive expressions;  
> What relies on words and what is free from words are all the meaning of True Suchness.  
> This conventional and this ultimate truth are not from conceptual passion but accord with wisdom;  
> Both truths are termed "true," and this truth has names and characters.  
> If one understands the nature's three thousand, this is the meaning of the fully perfected nature;  
> Each and every phenomenon is completely true and eternal; both name and reality are noble and revered.  
> Relying on this imaginary construct, how could it be placed in the same class?  
> Its substance is like flowers in the sky; what reality could correspond to its names?  
> Mind and form are non-dual in substance, yet within emotional attachments their difference is rigidly held;  
> Wishing to break through rigid attachments, one must push through to the utmost limit.  
> If one knows that they rely on the storehouse of principle, not a single phenomenon is discarded;  
> Lodging in this to reveal the perfect and eternal, when did one ever seek to distance oneself from it?  
> Though it is one pure clarity, its substance is endowed with the three thousand meanings;  
> Circumstantial and direct retributions are contained within principle, and the sense faculties and objects are complete within the nature.  
> Exclusive mind is just exclusive form; it is also exclusive fragrance and exclusive taste;  
> It is exclusive touch and exclusive sound; this principle is well worth pondering.  
> The forces of water and fire oppose each other; light and darkness can alternate in remedying;  
> Right within this mutual contradiction, one sees all the more the sense of mutual accord.  
> Mutual contradiction displays complete virtues; mutual accord expresses non-duality.  
> A wise person contemplates this well: how have root and branch ever differed?  
> The principle of contemplating mind is profound; at first glance it seems a contradictory meaning;  
> Arising from the āvarta-dhāraṇī, who would not hesitate?  
> Having presumed to act as a propagator of the teaching, I reflect on what rank I occupy;  
> A single word cannot settle the case; only upon rethinking can it be accomplished.  
> The nine realms are spoken of in terms of cultivating mind; the three paths of defilement are remedied through mind;  
> This contemplates from external objects: only when the external is broken does the internal become manifest.  
> In terms of principle they are unified, but on the basis of delusion they are provisionally divided into two;  
> Knowing the ultimate reason, how would one dare to rely on emotional effort?  
> All three phenomena are called subtle, yet mind alone is the most profound and secret;  
> Within the mind one sees the Dharma realm; sentient beings and Buddhas are brought to equal unity.  
> Confusing oneself and chasing other things, one rigidly sets up sentient beings and the insentient vessel-world;  
> Seeing form, one immediately sees mind; clearly it all arises from the nature.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.38)
- [Next: 3.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.40)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.39) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.39) · Pramāṇa
