[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [釋淨土群疑論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960) › 2.14 # 釋淨土群疑論 2.14 釋淨土群疑論 2.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2.14) 問曰：《攝大乘論》、《對法論》等，無著、天親諸大論師釋諸經論種種文義，有四意趣、四祕密言，唯由發願而得往生西方者，此是別時意。今日勸人修西方業即得往生，豈成道理？自《攝論》至此百有餘年，諸德咸見此論文，不修西方淨業。今即言得生，豈不與論相違也？ > Question: In works like the Mahāyānasaṃgraha and the Abhidharmasamuccaya-vyākhyā, the great treatise masters such as Asanga and Vasubandhu, in explaining the various expressions and meanings of the sūtras and treatises, speak of the four intentions and four secret intentions, \[stating that\] attaining rebirth in the West merely through making a vow is an intention regarding another time. Today, when you encourage people to cultivate the practices for the West and immediately attain rebirth, how does that make sense? For over a hundred years since the Mahāyānasaṃgraha \[was translated\] until now, the worthy masters have all seen this treatise passage and not cultivated the pure practices for the West. Now if you say that one attains rebirth, does this not contradict the treatise? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2.13) - [Next: 2.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2.15) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960~en-mt.2.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1960.2.14) · Pramāṇa