<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.8 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [往生淨土決疑行願二門](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968) › 1.8

# 往生淨土決疑行願二門 1.8

往生淨土決疑行願二門 1.8

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.8)

二、疑法者，佛法有二：一者小乘不了義法，二者大乘了義法。大乘中復有了不了義。今談淨土。唯是大乘了義中了義之法也。且小乘經部括盡貝書，曾無一字讚勸往生他方淨土，故天親論云「女人及根缺，二乘種不生」，此即明據也。

> Second, regarding doubting the Dharma: the Buddha-dharma has two \[aspects\]: first, the non-definitive Dharma of the Hīnayāna; second, the definitive Dharma of the Mahāyāna. Within the Mahāyāna, there are further definitive and non-definitive \[teachings\]. What is discussed now concerning the Pure Land is exclusively the definitive among definitive teachings of the Mahāyāna. Moreover, though one searches through all the palm-leaf scriptures of the Hīnayāna canon, there is not a single word praising and encouraging rebirth in another pure land. Therefore, Vasubandhu's treatise says: "Women, those with defective sense faculties, and the seed of the two vehicles are not born \[there\]." This is clear evidence.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.7)
- [Next: 1.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.9)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968~en-mt.1.8) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [樂邦文類](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.4.87) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1968.1.8) · Pramāṇa
