<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.214 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [樂邦文類](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a) › 1.214

# 樂邦文類 1.214

樂邦文類 1.214

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.214](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.214)

清涼《貞元疏》曰「無所從來下，正辨唯心，即心無心便入真如，了彼相虛唯心現故。以我即寂之唯心，叩彼即體之妙用，能念念念何動寂之相干？既了唯心，了心即佛，故隨所念無非佛矣。況志一不撓，精研造微，佛應克誠，于何不見？下列四喻，通顯唯心，喻無來往，別喻兼明不出入等。四喻皆具四觀：一正是唯心、二唯心故空、三唯心故假、四唯心故中，融而無礙，即華嚴意。夢喻不來不去、影喻不出不入、幻喻非有非無、響喻非合非散。三觀齊驅，以性融相，則入重重念佛之境，已見德雲。」

> Qingliang's Zhenyuan Shu states: "From 'come from nowhere' onward, it directly discerns mind-only: reaching no-mind in the very mind, one immediately enters tathatā, because one understands that those marks are empty and merely manifestations of mind. Using my mind-only that is inherently quiescent to resonate with that wondrous function that is identical with substance, in thought after thought, how could activity and quiescence interfere with each other? Once one understands mind-only, one understands that the mind is the Buddha; therefore, whatever is contemplated is nothing other than the Buddha. How much more so when one's resolve is unified and unswerving, refining into the subtle essence, the Buddha's response must be sincere—what would one not see? Below, four parables are listed to generally demonstrate mind-only: the parables illustrate no coming or going, and individually illustrate neither exiting nor entering, and so forth. All four parables possess the four contemplations: first, exactly mind-only; second, empty because of mind-only; third, provisional because of mind-only; fourth, middle because of mind-only; fusing without obstruction, this is the meaning of the Avataṃsaka. The dream parable illustrates neither coming nor going; the shadow parable illustrates neither exiting nor entering; the illusion parable illustrates neither existing nor non-existing; the echo parable illustrates neither joining nor dispersing. The three contemplations proceed in unison, fusing marks through nature, whereupon one enters the multifaceted realm of buddha-mindfulness, having already seen Meghashrī."  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.213](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.213)
- [Next: 1.215](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.215)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a~en-mt.1.214) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.86.11) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.214](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1969a.1.214) · Pramāṇa
