[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 13.10 # 宗鏡錄 13.10 宗鏡錄 13.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.10) 答。前明一中十者。離一無有十。而十非是一。若此明一即十者。離一無有十。而十即是一。緣成故也。二同體門者。還如前門。相似。還明一中多。多中一。一即多。多即一。今就此門中說者。前異體門言一中十者。以望後九故名一中十。此門言一中十者。即一中有九故言一中十也。 > Answer: Earlier, clarifying ten within one meant that apart from one there is no ten, yet ten is not one. Here, clarifying that one is identical with ten means that apart from one there is no ten, and ten is identical with one, because of conditioned completion. Second, regarding the gate of identical substance, it is also similar to the previous gate; it again clarifies many within one, one within many, one is identical with many, and many is identical with one. To explain within this gate now: in the previous gate of different substances, saying 'ten within one' was called 'ten within one' in relation to the subsequent nine; in this gate, saying 'ten within one' means that precisely within the one there are nine, hence it is said 'ten within one'. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.9) - [Next: 13.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.11) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.13.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.10) · Pramāṇa