<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 13.9

# 宗鏡錄 13.9

宗鏡錄 13.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [13.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.9)

問。前明一中多。多中一者。即一中有十。十中有一。此明一即十有何別耶。

> Question: Earlier it was clarified that the many is within the one and the one is within the many, which is ten being within one and one being within ten. What difference is there between that and the present explanation that one is identical with ten?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 13.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.8)
- [Next: 13.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.10)
- [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.13.9) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.13.9) · Pramāṇa
