宗鏡錄 35.6
宗鏡錄 35.6
- Language
- Classical Chinese
35.6.1
答。 則是一切凡聖。 心相重重。 心性無盡。 是心廣大。 是心圓融。 是心包含。 是心祕密。 若無此。 一心為宗。 則教門無一法可興。 諸佛無一字可說。 既全歸心旨。 廣備信根。 圓解已周。 纖疑不起。 不可唯憑口說。 密在心行。 但以定水。 潛澄。 慧燈轉耀。 若一向持文。 求理執教談宗。 如入海算。 塵砂仰空。 數星宿。 終不親見。 去道尤賒。 昔人云。 如天地。 終日轟轟。 不及真理。 是故學人去文取理。 端坐凝情。 以心眼自看。 是名專住一境。 修定勝因也。 又圓教義者。 本末融通。 理事無礙。 說真妄。 則凡聖昭昭而交徹。 語法界。 則理事歷歷而相收。 佛知見一偈。 開示而無遺。 大涅槃一章。 必盡其體用。 如華嚴經云。 無有智外如為智所入。 亦無如外智能證於如。 又云。 無有少法與法同止。 以舉心攝境。 則無心外之境。 舉境攝心。 則無境外之心。 以性無二相即性故。 相隨性融。 隨一皆攝。 是以性外無相。 則何法不融。 理中立事。 則何門不入。 可謂觸目菩提。 一念圓證。 所以無量義經云。 無量義者。 從一法生。 其一法者。 所謂無相。 古人云。 此是出生義。 法華經云。 究竟至於一切智地。 此是收入之法。 則三乘萬化。 從實相生。 究竟還歸一實相。 則初後不離一心。 本末咸居正位。 如法華經云。 心相體信。 入出無難。 可以知大乘家業。 紹佛種位。 又初則一出無量。 後乃無量歸一。 今無量非無量。 一亦非一。 即證法華三昧。 又先德目為教海者。 以含眾法。 喻如大海。 傍無邊涯。 連天一色。 空徹海底。 海映空天。 即是圓教。 總攝諸教歸真。 並皆空淨。 理事無礙。 如交映色空。 色不礙空。 空不礙色。 德用重重。 即唯明唯深。 具十玄門。 重重無盡。 即事事無礙。 如海十德。 互相周遍。 即心海包容。 深廣無際矣。 所以守護國界主陀羅尼。 經偈云。 一字演說一切法。 多劫無有窮盡時。 一一字門亦復然。 此住寶篋真言地。 生法師釋。 法華經。 一毫之善。 舉手低頭。 皆已成佛。 言。 無非佛流。 即涅槃意。 乃至外道典籍。 亦佛法流。 況內法耶。 大小等教。 皆從如來大悲所流故。 是知無有一法不從心原性空而出。 如源出水。 似空出雲。 以十方如來證心成佛。 佛即是心。 所有萬善萬德悲智願行。 無不從此流矣。 又約金師子章論五教者。 一此師子雖是因緣之法。 念念生滅。 實無師子可得。 名愚人法。 是聲聞教。 二即此緣生諸法。 各無自性。 徹底唯空。 名大乘初教。 三雖復徹底唯空。 不礙幻法宛然。 緣生幻有。 二相雙存。 名大乘終教。 四即此師子與金二相。 互奪兩亡。 情謂不存。 俱無有力。 空有雙泯。 名言路絕。 栖心無寄。 名大乘頓教。 五即此情盡體露之法。 混成一塊。 繁興大用。 起必全真。 萬像紛然。 參而不雜。 一切即一。 皆同無性。 一即一切。 因果歷然。 力用相收。 卷舒自在。 名一乘圓教。 此名最上乘也。 次天台立四教者。 一藏教。 明因緣生滅四諦理。 正教小乘。 傍化菩薩。 二通教。 三人同稟。 明因緣即空無生四真諦。 正為菩薩。 傍通二乘。 教理。 智斷行位因果皆空。 三人同證。 此藏通二教。 俱不識常住真心。 皆以滅心為極果。 三別教。 是不共之名。 明因緣假名無量四聖諦理。 約化菩薩。 不共二乘。 若教別者。 具演恒沙佛法。 別為菩薩。 若理別者。 藏識有恒沙俗諦之理。 乃至智斷行位因果。 俱與三教事別。 雖知一心不空無盡之理。 即今未具。 猶待次第生起。 執教道而不融。 據行布而成別。 四圓教。
Answer: It is simply the citta-characteristics of all ordinary beings and sages that are layer upon layer, and the citta-nature that is inexhaustible. This citta is vast; this citta is consummate and interfused; this citta encompasses all; this citta is esoteric. If there were no such one mind as the source, then among the gates of the teaching not a single dharma could arise, and the buddhas would not have a single word to speak. Having wholly returned to the purport of the citta, having extensively prepared the faculties of faith, consummate understanding being already complete, and not the slightest doubt arising, one must not rely solely on spoken words; the secret lies in practice in the citta. Simply use the water of concentration to secretly clarify, and the lamp of wisdom to shine ever more brightly. If one solely adheres to the texts to seek principle, clinging to the teachings to talk about the source, it is like entering the sea to count the grains of sand or looking up at the sky to number the stars: in the end one never sees it directly, and strays ever farther from the Way. An ancient said: 'Like heaven and earth thundering all day long, it does not equal the true principle.' Therefore, the student discards the texts to grasp the principle, sitting upright and stilling the feelings, beholding directly with the eye of the citta. This is called dwelling exclusively on a single object, cultivating the superior cause of concentration. Furthermore, as for the meaning of the Consummate Teaching: root and branch are interfused; principle and phenomenon are unobstructed. When speaking of the true and the false, ordinary beings and sages are luminously interpenetrating; when speaking of the dharmadhātu, principle and phenomenon distinctly contain each other. In a single verse on the Buddha's vision and knowledge, it is revealed without omission; in a single chapter on the Great Nirvāṇa, its substance and function are thoroughly exhausted. As the Avataṃsaka-sūtra says: 'There is no tathatā outside of wisdom for wisdom to enter, nor is there wisdom outside of tathatā that can realize tathatā.' It also says: 'There is no slight dharma that abides together with dharma.' Because when one adduces citta to subsume the object, there is no object outside of citta; when one adduces the object to subsume citta, there is no citta outside of the object. Because the nature has no duality of characteristics—characteristics are precisely nature—characteristics are interfused along with nature, and along with any one [characteristic], all are subsumed. Thus, outside nature there are no characteristics, so what dharma is not interfused? Within principle phenomena are established, so what gate cannot be entered? It can be described as bodhi wherever the eye touches, consummate realization in a single thought. Therefore, the Anantanirdeśa-sūtra says: 'Innumerable meanings are born from a single dharma; that single dharma is what is called signlessness.' The ancients said: 'This is the meaning of emergence.' The Lotus Sūtra says: 'Ultimately arriving at the stage of all-knowledge'; this is the dharma of gathering in. Thus the ten thousand transformations of the triyāna are born from the true characteristic, and ultimately return again to the one true characteristic. Thus beginning and end are not separated from the one mind; root and branch both abide in their proper positions. As the Lotus Sūtra says: 'In citta and characteristic, [they] personally believe; entering and exiting without difficulty.' One can thereby know the estate of the Mahāyāna, inheriting the stage of the buddha-lineage. Furthermore, initially the one produces the innumerable; later, the innumerable returns to the one. Now, the innumerable is not innumerable, and the one is also not one: this is precisely the realization of the Lotus Samādhi. Furthermore, the reason past virtuous ones designated it the 'Ocean of Teaching' is that it contains all dharmas, analogized to the great ocean: laterally it has no bounds, joining the sky in a single hue; empty space penetrates to the bottom of the ocean, and the ocean reflects empty sky. This is the Consummate Teaching: comprehensively subsuming all teachings to return to the true, all are utterly empty and pure; principle and phenomenon are unobstructed, like the mutual reflection of form and emptiness: form does not obstruct emptiness, and emptiness does not obstruct form. Virtues and functions are layer upon layer, being solely luminous and solely profound; endowed with the ten profound gates, layer upon layer without end, which is phenomenon-and-phenomenon non-obstruction. Like the ten virtues of the ocean mutually pervading, the ocean of citta contains all, profound and vast without limit. Therefore, the Dhāraṇī-sūtra of the Lord of the Country's Realm says in a verse: 'A single syllable expounds all dharmas; / for many kalpas there is no end. / Each and every syllable-gate is likewise so: / this is dwelling in the ground of the jewel-casket mantra.' Master Daosheng's commentary on the Lotus Sūtra says of the passage: 'A single hair of goodness, / raising a hand or bowing the head, / all have already realized buddhahood'—saying: 'Nothing is not an outflow of the Buddha; this is the purport of Nirvāṇa. Even non-Buddhist texts are also an outflow of the Buddhadharma; how much more so the internal dharma!' Because teachings great and small all flow from the Tathāgata's great compassion. From this we know that there is not a single dharma that does not emerge from the source of citta and emptiness of nature, like water coming forth from a source, or clouds coming forth from empty space. Because the Tathāgatas of the ten directions realize citta to become buddhas, the Buddha is simply citta; and all the ten thousand goods, ten thousand virtues, compassion, wisdom, vows, and practices without exception flow forth from this. Furthermore, to discuss the five teachings in terms of the Essay on the Golden Lion: First, although this lion is a dharma of causes and conditions, arising and ceasing from thought to thought, there is in truth no lion to be found. This is called the dharma of foolish persons, which is the Śrāvaka Teaching. Second, precisely these conditioned dharmas are each devoid of own-nature, being thoroughly nothing but empty. This is called the Initial Teaching of the Mahāyāna. Third, although it is thoroughly nothing but empty, it does not obstruct the illusory dharmas from remaining distinctly present; conditioned arising is illusory existence, and both characteristics are simultaneously maintained. This is called the Final Teaching of the Mahāyāna. Fourth, precisely these two characteristics of lion and gold mutually negate each other and both vanish; conceptual graspings do not persist, neither having any power; emptiness and existence are both extinguished; the path of words and speech is severed, and there is nowhere for the citta to lodge. This is called the Sudden Teaching of the Mahāyāna. Fifth, precisely this dharma in which feelings are exhausted and substance is exposed blends into a single whole; its great functions profusely arise, its arising inevitably being wholly the true; the ten thousand images are multifarious, intermingling without disorder; all is the one, identical in having no nature; the one is all, causes and effects distinctly apparent; power and function mutually subsume, folding up and unfolding with complete freedom. This is called the Consummate Teaching of the Ekayāna. This is called the Supreme Yāna. Next, Tiantai establishes the four teachings: First, the Tripiṭaka Teaching, which clarifies the principle of the four noble truths of arising and ceasing through causes and conditions; its primary teaching is the Hīnayāna, while incidentally converting bodhisattvas. Second, the Pervasive Teaching, which the three kinds of persons receive in common, clarifying the four true truths of unarisen causes and conditions that are empty as they are; it is primarily for bodhisattvas, and incidentally extends to the two vehicles; its teaching, principle, wisdom, elimination of defilements, practice, stages, cause, and effect are all empty, realized by the three kinds of persons in common. Both the Tripiṭaka and Pervasive teachings fail to recognize the permanently abiding true citta, and both take the cessation of the citta as the ultimate fruit. Third, the Distinct Teaching, which is a designation for what is not shared, clarifying the principle of the immeasurable four noble truths of nominal designations through causes and conditions; it concerns the conversion of bodhisattvas and is not shared with the two vehicles. As for its difference in teaching, it fully expounds Buddhadharmas numerous as the sands of the Ganges, distinctively for bodhisattvas; as for its difference in principle, the storehouse consciousness contains principles of conventional truth numerous as the sands of the Ganges, extending to its wisdom, elimination of defilements, practice, stages, cause, and effect, all of which are distinct from the phenomena of the other three teachings. Although it knows the principle that the one mind is inexhaustibly non-empty, it is not yet complete in the present, still awaiting sequential arising; it clings to the pedagogical path without interfusion, and establishes distinctions based on graduated stages. Fourth, the Consummate Teaching.
35.6.2
明不思議因緣無作四諦教理。 正說中道。 即一切法圓理不偏。 智圓。 則一成一切成。 斷圓。 則不斷而斷。 行圓。 則一心具足萬行。 位圓。 則一地具足一切地。 因圓。 則雙照二諦。 自然流入薩婆若海。 果圓。 則妙覺不思議三德之果。 即一念心圓具法界。 約觀心明四教者。 淨名疏云。 今但論即心行用。 識一切教門。 皆從初心觀行而起。 四教既攝一切經教。 若一念觀心分明。 能分別一念無明因緣所生之心。 四辯歷然。 則一切經教大意。 皆約觀心通達。 就此即為四意。 第一約觀心明三藏教相者。 即是觀一念因緣所生之心生滅。 析假入空。 約觀門起一切三藏教也。 若觀生滅四諦入道。 即是脩多羅藏。 故增一阿含云。 佛告諸比丘。 謂一切法者。 只是一法。 何等為一法。 心是一法。 離心無一切法也。 智度論云。 從初轉法輪經。 至大涅槃。 結修多羅藏。 此只是約心生滅說四聖諦。 即是法歸法本之義也。 觀心出一切毘尼藏者。 佛制戒時。 問諸比丘。 汝何心作。 若有心作。 即是犯戒。 有犯故有持也。 若無心作。 則不名犯。 犯義不成。 不說持也。 故重心發戒。 無心則不發戒。 若言。 從心出阿毘曇藏者。 四卷略說。 名毘曇心。 達磨多羅處中而說。 名為雜心。 如此皆是約心。 而辯毘曇無比法者。 分別諸心心數法。 一切法不可比也。 第二約觀心明通教者。 觀心因緣所生一切法。 心空則一切法空。 是為體假入空。 一切通教所明行位因果。 皆從此起也。 第三約觀心明別教者。 觀心因緣所生。 即假名。 具足一切恒沙佛法。 依無明阿賴耶識。 分別無量聖諦。 一切別教所明行位因果。 皆從此起也。 第四約觀心明圓教者。 觀心因緣所生。 具足一切十法界法。 無所積聚。 不縱不橫。 不思議中道二諦之理。 一切圓教所明行位因果。 皆從此起。 如輪王頂上明珠。 是則四教皆從一念無明心起。 上來數引華嚴經。 明破微塵出三千大千世界經卷。 義意在此也。 又約頓漸不定祕密。 通前四教總立八教。 一頓教。 如華嚴無聲聞乘。 故名為頓。 二漸教。 即三藏及方等般若。 漸引入圓教。 三不定教。 謂一音異解。 或說大而得小果。 或說小而得大道。 故名為不定。 四祕密教。 此有二種。 一顯露祕密。 謂同席異聞。 不得道。 果互不相知。 故名祕密。 二祕密祕密。 唯佛能證。 密令眾生而得開悟。 不可指示。 總前四教而成八教。 又教分五味。 釋論云。 旃延子明六度限劑而滿者。 此調雜血眾生為乳也。 大品云。 菩薩發心與薩婆若相應者。 此欲調乳入酪也。 大品云。 菩薩發心遊戲神通淨佛國土。 又如淨名中得不思議解脫者。 皆能變身登座。 而復能受屈被訶者。 此欲調酪為生酥就熟酥也。 大品云。 菩薩發心。 即坐道樹。 成正覺。 轉法輪。 度眾生者。 是調熟酥為醍醐也。 此乃從一開一。 接引酥酪之機。 後即會一歸一。 成熟醍醐之眾。 終無別法。 更有卷舒。 本迹相收。 機應冥合。 又分半滿之教。 小乘為半。 大乘為滿。 又三乘為半。 一乘為滿。 如涅槃經明半字及滿字等。 說半字故。 半字即顯。 滿字即隱。 今日說滿字者。 滿字即顯。 半字即隱。 此即約緣而說隱顯。 又如月喻品。 此方見半。 他方見滿。 而彼月性。 本無虧盈。 隨緣所見。 故有增減。 此即是大乘宗中說也。 如智儼法師。 依華嚴一乘宗辯者。 不待說與不說。 常半而常滿。 隱顯無別時。 如彼月性。 常滿而常半。 增減無異路。 正同宗鏡所錄法門。 隱則一心無相。 顯則萬法標形。 不壞前後而同時。 常居一際而前後。 當舒即卷。 當卷即舒。 故知以教照心。
First, the one produces the immeasurable: this clarifies the doctrine and principle of the inconceivable conditioned arising and the non-active four noble truths. It correctly expounds the Middle Way: namely, all dharmas are the perfect principle, without bias. As for the perfection of wisdom: when one is accomplished, all are accomplished. As for the perfection of eradication: without eradication, there is eradication. As for the perfection of practice: one mind is completely endowed with the myriad practices. As for the perfection of stages: one stage is completely endowed with all stages. As for the perfection of causes: it doubly illuminates the two truths, naturally flowing into the ocean of sarvajñā. As for the perfection of fruits: it is the wondrous awakening and inconceivable fruit of the three virtues. That is, a single moment of mind is perfectly endowed with the dharmadhātu. Explaining the four teachings in terms of contemplating the mind: the Commentary on Vimalakīrti says, 'Now we only discuss the operation and function of the mind itself, recognizing that all doctrinal gateways arise from the contemplative practice of the initial mind. Since the four teachings subsume all scriptural teachings, if in a single moment the contemplation of the mind is distinct and clear, and one can discern the mind produced by the conditioned arising of a single moment of avidyā, the fourfold eloquence being evident, then the overarching purport of all scriptural teachings is thoroughly understood in terms of contemplating the mind.' Regarding this, there are four points: First, explaining the characteristics of the Tripiṭaka teaching in terms of contemplating the mind: this is contemplating the arising and ceasing of the mind produced by conditioned arising in a single moment, analyzing the conventional to enter emptiness. In terms of the portal of contemplation, it gives rise to all the Tripiṭaka teachings. If one enters the Way by contemplating the four noble truths of arising and ceasing, this is the Sūtra Piṭaka. Thus the Ekottarika-āgama says: 'The Buddha addressed the monks: "What is called 'all dharmas' is just one dharma. What is this one dharma? The mind is this one dharma. Apart from the mind, there are no dharmas at all."' The Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa says: 'From the Sūtra of Turning the Dharma Wheel up to the Mahāparinirvāṇa, the Sūtra Piṭaka was compiled.' This is merely explaining the four noble truths in terms of the arising and ceasing of the mind, which is the meaning of 'dharmas returning to the root of dharmas.' Contemplating the mind gives rise to all the Vinaya Piṭaka: when the Buddha instituted the precepts, he asked the monks, 'With what mind did you do it?' If one did it with intention, that is a violation of the precepts. Because there is violation, there is keeping [the precepts]. If one did it unintentionally, it is not called a violation. The sense of violation being unestablished, keeping is not spoken of. Therefore, the precepts arise from gravity of mind; without mind, precepts do not arise. As for saying that the Abhidharma Piṭaka arises from the mind: the brief exposition in four fascicles is named the Abhidharmahṛdaya (*Heart of Abhidharma*). Dharmatrāta's intermediate exposition is named the Samyuktābhidharmahṛdaya (*Miscellaneous Heart of Abhidharma*). That they distinguish the Abhidharma's incomparable teachings in this way is entirely in terms of the mind: discerning all states of mind and mental factors, all dharmas are incomparable. Second, explaining the shared teaching in terms of contemplating the mind: contemplating that all dharmas are produced by the mind's conditioned arising, when the mind is empty, then all dharmas are empty. This is embodying the conventional to enter emptiness. All practices, stages, causes, and fruits explained in the shared teaching arise from this. Third, explaining the distinct teaching in terms of contemplating the mind: contemplating that what is produced by the mind's conditioned arising is conventional designation, completely endowed with all the sands-of-the-Ganges Buddha-dharmas. Relying on the avidyā-ālayavijñāna, it discerns the immeasurable noble truths. All practices, stages, causes, and fruits explained in the distinct teaching arise from this. Fourth, explaining the perfect teaching in terms of contemplating the mind: contemplating that what is produced by the mind's conditioned arising is completely endowed with all dharmas of the ten dharmadhātus, without accumulation, neither vertical nor horizontal, the inconceivable principle of the Middle Way and the two truths. All practices, stages, causes, and fruits explained in the perfect teaching arise from this, like the bright jewel on the crown of a cakravartin. Thus, the four teachings all arise from a single moment of the mind of avidyā. The repeated citations above from the Avataṃsakasūtra, clarifying that crushing a fine particle of dust yields a sūtra scroll of the great trichiliocosm, have their intended meaning here. Furthermore, in terms of sudden, gradual, indeterminate, and esoteric, combining these with the preceding four teachings establishes eight teachings in total. First, the sudden teaching: as in the Avataṃsaka, where there is no śrāvaka vehicle; hence it is called sudden. Second, the gradual teaching: namely the Tripiṭaka, Vaipulya, and Prajñā, gradually leading into the perfect teaching. Third, the indeterminate teaching: meaning one voice, diverse understandings; or preaching the great and attaining the small fruit, or preaching the small and attaining the great path; hence it is called indeterminate. Fourth, the esoteric teaching: this has two kinds: 1. the overt-esoteric, meaning being in the same assembly but hearing differently, without attaining the path, their fruits mutually unknown; hence it is called esoteric; 2. the secret-esoteric, which only the Buddhas can realize, secretly causing sentient beings to attain awakening, impossible to point out. Combining these with the preceding four teachings forms the eight teachings. Furthermore, the teachings are divided into five flavors. The Treatise says: Kātyāyanīputra's clarifying the limits and fulfillment of the six pāramitās is the seasoning of sentient beings of mixed blood into milk. The Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā says: the bodhisattva's giving rise to the mind in accord with sarvajñā is the desire to season milk into curd. The Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā says: the bodhisattva's giving rise to the mind to disport in spiritual penetrations and purify Buddha-lands; and as in the Vimalakīrti, those who attain the inconceivable liberation are all able to transform their bodies and ascend the seats, yet can also accept humbling and being rebuked—this is the desire to season curd into butter and bring it to clarified butter. The Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā says: the bodhisattva's giving rise to the mind, immediately sitting beneath the tree of the Way, realizing right awakening, turning the wheel of the Dharma, and delivering sentient beings is seasoning clarified butter into ghee. This is opening one from one to guide capacities suited for curd and butter, and later gathering the one back to the one to mature the assembly suited for ghee. Ultimately there is no separate dharma; there is only unfolding and rolling up, origin and trace mutually subsuming, capacity and response darkly coalescing. Furthermore, they are divided into half-letter and full-letter teachings: the Hīnayāna is the half; the Mahāyāna is the full. Also, the triyāna is the half; the ekayāna is the full. As the Nirvāṇasūtra explains the half-word and the full-word, when the half-word is spoken, the half-word is manifest and the full-word is hidden. When the full-word is spoken today, the full-word is manifest and the half-word is hidden. This is speaking of the hidden and manifest according to conditions. It is also like the Chapter on the Parable of the Moon: here one sees a half [moon], elsewhere one sees a full [moon], yet the nature of that moon fundamentally has neither waxing nor waning; seen according to conditions, there is increase and decrease. This is spoken within the Mahāyāna tradition. As Dharma Master Zhiyan discerns based on the Huayan ekayāna tradition: without waiting for speaking or not speaking, it is constantly half and constantly full, with no separate times for hidden and manifest. Like the nature of that moon, it is constantly full and constantly half; increase and decrease share no separate course. This is precisely identical to the Dharma gate recorded in the Mirror of the Source: hidden, it is the one mind without marks; manifest, it displays the forms of the myriad dharmas. Without destroying before and after, it is simultaneous; constantly abiding in one limit, yet it has before and after. When it should unfold, it rolls up; when it should roll up, it unfolds. Therefore we know: illuminate the mind through the teaching.
35.6.3
以心明教。 諸佛所說。 悉是自心。 輔行記引華嚴經頌云。 諸佛悉了知。 一切從心轉。 若能如是解。 彼人真見佛。 寶性論云。 有神通人。 見佛法滅。 以大千經卷。 藏一塵中。 又華嚴云。 善哉善哉。 云何如來在於身中而不覺知。 故明四諦十二因緣境。 八萬四千法門。 不出一心。 若得此意。 八年廣演法華。 在乎一念。 經五十劫。 詎動剎那。 例一代逗機。 居于心性。 十方佛事。 宛然矚目。 乃至涅槃三德。 在一心中。 則大經一部。 全標方寸。 無邊教法。 攝一剎那。 千枝萬葉。 同宗一根。 眾籍群經咸詮一法。 如上所引。 五味八教半滿等文。 然雖分判一代時教。 皆是一心融攝。 一理全收。 分而非多。 聚而非一。 散而不異。 合而不同。 恒沙義門。 無盡宗趣。 皆於一乘圓教宗鏡中現。 所以古德云。 契之於心。 然後以之為法。 在心為法。 形言為教。 法有自相共相。 教有遮詮表詮。 故知就事雖分。 約理常合。 乃至開為恒沙法門。 究竟不離一心之旨。 若從一心中方便開示成其教迹者。 即不可定其權實時分前後。 以是如來逗機一期方便。 竊不得自生決定解耶有乖正法。 如法華玄義云。 約五味半滿相成者。 若直論五味。 猶同南師。 但得方便。 若直論半滿。 猶同北師。 但得其實。 今明五味不離半滿。 半滿不離五味。 五味有半滿。 則有慧方便解。 半滿有五味。 則有方便慧解。 權實俱遊。 如鳥二翼。 雖復俱遊。 行藏得所。 若華嚴頓滿大乘家業。 但明一實。 不須方便。 唯滿不半。 於漸成乳。 三藏客作。 但是方便。 唯半不滿。 於漸成酪。 若方等彈訶。 則半滿相對。 以滿斥半。 於漸成生酥。 若大品領教。 帶半論滿。 半則通為三乘。 滿則獨為菩薩。 於漸成熟酥。 若法華付財。 廢半明滿。 若無半字方便調熟鈍根。 則亦無滿字開佛知見。 於漸成醍醐。 如來慇懃稱歎方便者。 半有成滿之功。 意在此也。 次約觀分別者。 唯識宗立二種觀。 華嚴宗立四觀。 天台教立三觀。 普賢門立十觀。 唯識二觀者。 一唯心識觀。 二真如實觀。 進趣大乘方便經云。 若依一實境界修信解者。 應當學習二種觀道。 一唯心識觀。 二真如實觀。 學唯心識觀者。 所謂於一切時一切處。 隨身口意所有作業。 悉當觀察。 知唯是心。 乃至一切境界。 若心往念。 皆當察知。 勿令使心無記攀緣。 不自覺知。 於念念間。 悉應觀察。 隨心所有緣念。 當使心隨逐彼念。 令心自知。 知已內心自生想念。 非一切境界有念有分別也。 所謂內心自生長短好惡。 是非得失。 衰利有無等見。 無量諸想。 而一切境界。 未曾有想起於分別。 當知一切境界。 自無分別想。 故即自非長非短。 非好非惡。 乃至非有非無。 離一切相。 如是觀察一切法。 唯心想生。 若使離心。 則無一法一相而能自見有差別也。 真如實觀者。 思惟心性無生無滅。 不住見聞覺知。 永離一切分別之想。 華嚴四觀者。 此約一心真如法界。 就理事行布圓融。 成四種法界。 對此法界。 為四種觀門。 此四觀門。 法本如是。 故依法而觀。 故名為觀。 一事觀。 謂迷悟因果。 染淨歷然。 二理觀。 謂我法俱空。 平等一相。 三理事無礙觀。 謂彼此相遍。 隱顯成奪。 同時無礙。 四事事無礙觀。 謂觀事法以理融故。 相即相入。 重重無盡。 若依此一心無礙之觀。 念念即是華嚴法界。 念念即是毘盧遮那法界。 經云。 若與如是觀行相應。 於諸法中不生二解。 一切佛法疾得現前。 台教三觀者。 三觀義云。 夫三寸之管。 氣序不衰。 一尺之表。 朝陽可測。 是知得其道者。 豈遠乎哉。
Explaining the teachings by means of the mind: everything spoken by the buddhas is one's own mind. The Fuxing ji cites a verse from the Avataṃsaka-sūtra: / "The buddhas fully know / That everything turns according to mind. / If one can understand in this way, / That person truly sees the Buddha." / The Ratnagotravibhāga says: "A person of supernormal powers saw the disappearance of the Buddha's Dharma, and concealed the scrolls of scriptures of the great trichiliocosm within a single speck of dust." Also, the Avataṃsaka says: "Excellent, excellent! How is it that the Tathāgata is present within the body yet [sentient beings] are unaware?" Therefore, it is clear that the objects of the four noble truths and the twelve links of dependent origination, and the eighty-four thousand dharma-gates, do not go beyond the one mind. If one grasps this meaning, then the eight years of broadly expounding the Lotus [Sūtra] are present in a single thought-moment; passing through fifty kalpas—how could that stir a single kṣaṇa? By analogy, an entire lifetime of adapting to capacities resides within the nature of the mind; the buddha-deeds of the ten directions are vividly before one's eyes. Even up to the three virtues of nirvāṇa, they reside within the one mind; thus an entire vast scripture is fully marked upon one's own heart. Boundless dharmas of the teaching are gathered into a single kṣaṇa. Thousands of branches and ten thousand leaves share the one root as their source; numerous texts and all sūtras without exception expound the one dharma. As cited above, the passages on the five flavors, the eight teachings, the half and the full, and so forth, although they classify and judge the teachings of a whole lifetime, are nevertheless all harmoniously gathered into the one mind and entirely comprehended by the one principle. Divided, yet not many; gathered, yet not one; dispersed, yet not different; united, yet not identical. Dharma-doors numerous as the sands of the Ganges and inexhaustible purports all appear within the mirror of the source of the One Vehicle's perfect teaching. Therefore, an ancient worthy said: "Match it to the mind, and thereafter take it as dharma. In the mind it is dharma; expressed in words it is teaching. Dharmas have their own characteristics (svalakṣaṇa) and common characteristics (sāmānyalakṣaṇa); the teachings have negative definition (apoha) and positive presentation." Therefore we know that although they are divided in terms of phenomena, in terms of principle they are always united. Even when opened into dharma-gates numerous as the sands of the Ganges, they ultimately do not depart from the purport of the one mind. If skillful means are opened and revealed from within the one mind to constitute the traces of the teachings, one cannot fix their provisionality and reality, or their temporal sequence of earlier and later, because these are a period of skillful means employed by the Tathāgata to adapt to capacities. One must not secretly give rise to a fixed interpretation and thereby deviate from the true Dharma. As the Fahua xuanyi says: In terms of the mutual completion of the five flavors and the half and full: if one merely discusses the five flavors, it is like the southern masters, who grasped only the skillful means; if one merely discusses the half and full, it is like the northern masters, who grasped only the reality. Now we clarify that the five flavors are not separated from the half and the full, and the half and the full are not separated from the five flavors. When the five flavors possess the half and full, there is understanding of skillful means through wisdom; when the half and full possess the five flavors, there is understanding of wisdom through skillful means. Provisional and real travel together like the two wings of a bird. Although traveling together, activity and concealment find their proper place: in the Avataṃsaka, the sudden and full family business of the Great Vehicle explains only the one reality without needing skillful means; it is solely full and not half, which in the gradual [sequence] corresponds to fresh milk. The guest laborer of the Tripiṭaka is merely skillful means; it is solely half and not full, which in the gradual [sequence] corresponds to curd. In the Vaipulya's reproaches and admonitions, the half and full stand opposite each other, using the full to rebuke the half; in the gradual [sequence] this corresponds to raw butter. In the Great Chapter's (Prajñāpāramitā) taking charge of the teaching, it carries the half to discuss the full: the half applies generally to the three vehicles, while the full applies uniquely to the bodhisattvas; in the gradual [sequence] this corresponds to clarified butter. In the Lotus Sūtra's bequest of property, it discards the half to explain the full: if there were no half-word skillful means to mature the dull-witted, there would also be no full-word revealing of the Buddha's knowledge and vision; in the gradual [sequence] this corresponds to ghee. That the Tathāgata earnestly praised skillful means was because the half possesses the efficacy of completing the full; this was his intention. Next, distinguishing them in terms of contemplation: the Yogācāra school establishes two kinds of contemplation; the Huayan school establishes four contemplations; the Tiantai teaching establishes three contemplations; and the gate of Samantabhadra establishes ten contemplations. As for the two contemplations of Yogācāra: first, the contemplation of mind-and-consciousness-only; second, the contemplation of the reality of tathatā. The Scripture on Skillful Means for Progressing Toward the Great Vehicle says: "If one cultivates faith and understanding based on the realm of the one reality, one should practice two kinds of paths of contemplation: first, the contemplation of mind-and-consciousness-only; second, the contemplation of the reality of tathatā. As for practicing the contemplation of mind-and-consciousness-only: at all times and in all places, following all actions produced by body, speech, and mind, one should observe them all and know that they are consciousness-only. Even regarding all objective realms, if the mind turns toward them in thought, one should observe and know them all, not letting the mind engage in neutral conditions without self-awareness. In thought-moment after thought-moment, one should observe everything: following whatever conditioned thoughts the mind has, one should make the mind follow those thoughts and cause the mind to know itself. Having known, [one realizes that] it is the inner mind itself that produces ideations and thoughts, not that all objective realms possess thought or conceptual distinction. That is, the inner mind itself produces views such as long and short, good and bad, right and wrong, gain and loss, decline and prosperity, existence and non-existence, and countless thoughts, while all objective realms have never had thought or given rise to conceptual distinction. One should know that all objective realms are themselves devoid of conceptual thought; therefore they are intrinsically neither long nor short, neither good nor bad, up to neither existing nor non-existing, separated from all characteristics. Observing all dharmas in this way, they are produced solely from mental ideation. If separated from the mind, not a single dharma or characteristic could see itself as having distinctions." As for the contemplation of the reality of tathatā: contemplating that the nature of mind is without arising and without ceasing, not abiding in seeing, hearing, perceiving, or knowing, forever free from all thoughts of conceptual distinction. As for the four contemplations of Huayan: this is based on the dharmadhātu of tathatā of the one mind; in terms of the distribution and perfect interpenetration of principle and phenomena, four kinds of dharmadhātu are established. In correspondene to these dharmadhātus, there are four kinds of gates of contemplation. As for these four gates of contemplation, dharmas are originally like this, so one contemplates in accordance with the dharmas, hence it is called 'contemplation': 1. The contemplation of phenomena, which means that delusion and awakening, cause and effect, defilement and purity are distinct. 2. The contemplation of principle, which means that self and dharmas are both empty, equal in a single characteristic. 3. The contemplation of the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena, which means that they pervade each other, conceal and reveal, complete and appropriate each other, unobstructed at the same time. 4. The contemplation of the non-obstruction of phenomena and phenomena, which means that observing phenomenal dharmas are merged through principle, they are mutually identical and mutually interpenetrating, endlessly layered without limit. If one relies on this unobstructed contemplation of the one mind, thought-moment after thought-moment is the Huayan dharmadhātu; thought-moment after thought-moment is the Vairocana dharmadhātu. The sūtra says: "If one accords with such practice of contemplation, one does not give rise to dualistic understanding regarding dharmas, and all buddhadharmas swiftly appear before one." As for the three contemplations of the Tiantai teaching: The Meaning of the Three Contemplations says: "A tube of three inches ensures the seasonal vapors do not decay; a gnomon of one foot can measure the morning sun. From this we know that for those who grasp the Way, could it ever be far away?"
35.6.4
三觀詣理之妙門。 今明此義。 故借為喻也。 仰佛法遐蹤。 神功浩曠。 求茲非遠。 寄以一心。 體之有原。 總乎三智。 若其假方便以致殊。 會歸一道。 寂然而雙照。 三觀之名。 出自瓔珞。 經。 云從假入空。 名二諦觀。 從空入假。 名平等觀。 雙照二諦。 心心寂滅。 自然流入薩婆若海也。
The three contemplations are the wondrous gate that penetrates to principle. Now in clarifying this meaning, we borrow these as metaphors. Looking up to the distant traces of the Buddha's Dharma, its spiritual efficacy is vast and expansive. Seeking this is not far off; it is entrusted to the one mind. Grasping its origin, it synthesizes the three wisdoms. If one employs provisional skillful means to bring about distinctions, they converge back to the one path, tranquil and doubly illuminating. The names of the three contemplations come from the Yingluo jing. The sūtra says: "Entering emptiness from the provisional is called the contemplation of the two truths. Entering the provisional from emptiness is called the contemplation of equality. Doubly illuminating the two truths, mind after mind is tranquil and ceased, naturally flowing into the ocean of sarvajñā."
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 維摩經玄疏 — Classical Chinese