<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.4 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 37.4

# 宗鏡錄 37.4

宗鏡錄 37.4

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [37.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.4)

問。何不唯取本質為正教體。即休。

> Question: Why not simply take the archetype alone as the primary substance of the teaching, and leave it at that?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 37.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.3)
- [Next: 37.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.5)
- [Up: 37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.37.4) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.37.4) · Pramāṇa
