[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 51.31 # 宗鏡錄 51.31 宗鏡錄 51.31 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [51.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.31) 答。今此是宗依。但他宗中有不離義。便得以小乘許眼識緣色。親取其體。有不離義。兼許眼識。當體亦不離眼識。故無能別不極成過。 > Answer: Here, this is the basis of the thesis (pakṣa-saṃbandhin). So long as there is an unseparated sense within the other tradition, it can be employed: because the Hīnayāna accepts that visual consciousness cognises matter, taking its substance directly, there is the sense of non-separation; and in addition, they accept that visual consciousness itself is essentially not separate from visual consciousness; therefore, there is no fallacy of an unestablished qualifier. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 51.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.30) - [Next: 51.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.32) - [Up: 51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.51.31) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.31) · Pramāṇa