<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.46 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 51.46

# 宗鏡錄 51.46

宗鏡錄 51.46

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [51.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.46)

問。既無此過。何以因明疏云。犯法自相相違決定過。

> Question: 'Since this fallacy does not exist, why does the commentary on Hetuvidyā say that it commits the fallacy of decisive contradiction with the intrinsic nature of the predicate?'  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 51.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.45)
- [Next: 51.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.47)
- [Up: 51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.51.46) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.46) · Pramāṇa
