[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 51.47 # 宗鏡錄 51.47 宗鏡錄 51.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [51.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.47) 答。但是疏主縱筆之勢。是前共不定過中分出。是似法自相相違決定過。非真有故。有此所因。故置初三攝眼所不攝。更互簡諸不定及相違等過。次明寄言簡過者。 > Answer: This is merely a rhetorical flourish by the commentator. It was distinguished out of the previously mentioned shared inconclusive fallacy, and is only a semblance of the fallacy of decisive contradiction with the intrinsic nature of the predicate, not a genuinely existing one. Due to this factor, the reason "subsumed under the first three and not subsumed under the eye" is posited, mutually eliminating various inconclusivenesses, contradictions, and other fallacies. Next is the explanation of inserting words to eliminate fallacies. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 51.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.46) - [Next: 51.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.48) - [Up: 51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.51.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.47) · Pramāṇa