<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.60 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 51.60

# 宗鏡錄 51.60

宗鏡錄 51.60

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [51.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.60)

一問。真故二字。已簡違教過。何故前陳宗依上。若不著極成言。又有違宗之失。

> First question: The two characters "in the ultimate sense" already exclude the fault of contradicting scriptural teachings. Why is it that, on the locus of the thesis (pakṣa-adhikaraṇa) stated as the subject, if one does not add the words "universally recognized," there is also the fault of contradicting the thesis?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 51.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.59)
- [Next: 51.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.61)
- [Up: 51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.51.60) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.51.60) · Pramāṇa
