[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 52.30 # 宗鏡錄 52.30 宗鏡錄 52.30 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [52.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.30) 答。有二解。第一見分名思量。內二分不名思量。但名意。見分不名意。有思量。以是用故。思量我無我。內二分不能思量我無我。但名意。以是體故。第二見分是思量相。相者。體相。相狀。內二分是思量性。即內外皆名意。三分皆思量。但除相分。相分是所量境也。 > Answer: There are two explanations. First, the darśanabhāga is called 'cogitation' (manana), while the two internal parts are not called 'cogitation' but are called only 'manas'. The darśanabhāga is not called 'manas'; it has cogitation because it is function: it cogitates self and non-self. The two internal parts cannot cogitate self and non-self; they are called only 'manas' because they are substance. Second, the darśanabhāga is the characteristic of cogitation—'characteristic' meaning substantial characteristic and outward appearance—while the two internal parts are the nature of cogitation. Thus, both internal and external are called 'manas', and all three parts are cogitation, excluding only the nimittabhāga. The nimittabhāga is the object cogitated. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 52.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.29) - [Next: 52.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.31) - [Up: 52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.30) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.30) · Pramāṇa