[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 52.42 # 宗鏡錄 52.42 宗鏡錄 52.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [52.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.42) 答。第七中間相分是假。無實種生。但從兩頭起。此相分。仍通二性。若一半從本質上起者。是無覆性。即屬本質。若一半從自能緣第七見分上起者。同見分。是有覆性。但兩頭心法爍起。成一相分。今言境假者。但約隨妄心我相分以說。 > Answer: The seventh's intermediate nimittabhāga is nominal and is not produced from real seeds; it merely arises from both ends. This nimittabhāga nevertheless extends across two moral natures: if one half arises from the original substance, it is of the non-obscured nature and belongs to the original substance; if one half arises from its own apprehending seventh darśanabhāga, it is the same as the darśanabhāga and is of the obscured nature. Merely through mental dharmas flaring up from both ends, a single nimittabhāga is formed. When it is said now that the object is nominal, it is spoken of only in reference to the nimittabhāga of self that accords with the deluded mind. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 52.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.41) - [Next: 52.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.43) - [Up: 52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.42) · Pramāṇa