<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.13 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 59.13

# 宗鏡錄 59.13

宗鏡錄 59.13

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [59.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.13)

答。雖非識變。識實性故。亦名唯識。真如離言。與能計識。非一非異。非如色等可依起執。故非執依。此中不說。若遠望疎。言亦可依執。法。末學者。依起執故。又真如既非識所轉變。應非唯識。不以變故。名為唯識。不離識故。正名唯識。

> Answer: Although it is not transformed by consciousness, because it is the real nature of consciousness, it is also named vijñapti-mātra. Tathatā transcends words, and is neither identical with nor different from the conceptualizing consciousness. It is not like material form and so forth, upon which grasping can arise; therefore, it is not a basis of grasping. It is not spoken of here. Yet viewed remotely and distantly, words can also serve as the basis for grasping, because latter-day students rely upon them to give rise to grasping. Furthermore, since tathatā is not transformed by consciousness, it might seem not to be vijñapti-mātra. It is not because of transformation that it is named vijñapti-mātra; rather, because it is not separate from consciousness, it is properly named vijñapti-mātra.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 59.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.12)
- [Next: 59.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.14)
- [Up: 59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.59.13) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.59.13) · Pramāṇa
