<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 6.9

# 宗鏡錄 6.9

宗鏡錄 6.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.9)

問。若始覺異本。即不成始也。若始同本。即無始覺之異。如何說言對始名本。

> Question: If initial enlightenment is different from original enlightenment, then it does not constitute 'initial.' If initial enlightenment is identical to original enlightenment, then there is no difference of an initial enlightenment. How then can one speak of naming 'original' in contrast to 'initial'?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.8)
- [Next: 6.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.10)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.9) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.9) · Pramāṇa
