<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.2 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 60.2

# 宗鏡錄 60.2

宗鏡錄 60.2

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [60.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.2)

夫此三性法。為當是一是異。若道是一。不合云依圓是有。遍計是無。若道是異。又云皆同一性。所謂無性。

> Now, are these phenomena of the three natures identical or different? If you say they are identical, it is improper to say that the other-dependent and consummate are existent while the imagined is non-existent. If you say they are different, it is also said that they are all of the same nature, namely no-nature.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 60.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.1)
- [Next: 60.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.3)
- [Up: 60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.60.2) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.2) · Pramāṇa
