<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.34 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 60.34

# 宗鏡錄 60.34

宗鏡錄 60.34

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [60.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.34)

問。若說緣生為空無。即墮斷者。何故中論廣說緣生為畢竟空耶。

> Question: If stating that conditioned arising is empty and non-existent falls into annihilation, why does the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā broadly explain conditioned arising as ultimately empty?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 60.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.33)
- [Next: 60.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.35)
- [Up: 60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.60.34) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.60.34) · Pramāṇa
