[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 62.10 # 宗鏡錄 62.10 宗鏡錄 62.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [62.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.10) 問。欲色二界。有外器色境。云是心變故。所言唯心。且如無色界天。唯有內心。無外色境。何要更言唯心。豈不成相扶極成過。 > Question: In the desire and form realms, there are external material objects of the receptacle realm, and because these are said to be transformations of citta, one speaks of mind-only. But in the case of the gods of the formless realm, there is only inner citta and no external material objects. Why is it necessary to speak of mind-only there as well? Would that not commit the fallacy of proving what is already established (siddhasādhana)? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 62.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.9) - [Next: 62.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.11) - [Up: 62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.62.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.10) · Pramāṇa