[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 62.12 # 宗鏡錄 62.12 宗鏡錄 62.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [62.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.12) 問。若不致極成兩宗簡。即有何過。 > Question: If one does not set it aside by adding ‘well-established’ for both schools, what fallacy would there be? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 62.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.11) - [Next: 62.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.13) - [Up: 62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.62.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.62.12) · Pramāṇa