<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.27 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 68.27

# 宗鏡錄 68.27

宗鏡錄 68.27

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [68.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.27)

答。有相尚空。無相何有。時亦無體。延促由心。以始從一念。終成於劫。念若不起。時劫本空。但有初中後等時量。皆是唯識之時。廣百論破時品云。復次是則一切若假若實。皆依世俗假相施設。云何汝等。定執諸法。皆是實體。

> Answer: What has characteristics is already empty; how could what lacks characteristics exist? Time also has no substance; extension and brevity depend on the mind. For beginning from a single instant, it ultimately forms an eon. If the instant does not arise, the eon is fundamentally empty; there are only measures of time such as beginning, middle, and end, which are all time of vijñaptimātra. The Guǎng bǎi lùn's "Chapter on Refuting Time" says: 'Furthermore, thus all dharmas, whether conventional or real, are designated relying on conventional, provisional characteristics. Why do you definitively grasp all dharmas as having a real substance?'  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 68.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.26)
- [Next: 68.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.28)
- [Up: 68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.68.27) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.27) · Pramāṇa
