[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 68.39 # 宗鏡錄 68.39 宗鏡錄 68.39 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [68.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.39) 答。古釋云。唯意所緣。謂時之一法是假。前五第八俱不能緣。第七又常緣內第八見分為我。兼無分別故。唯第六能緣。又四種意識中。唯明了意識不能緣。時是假故。即定中。夢中。獨散。此三俱能緣。若約三境中。是獨影境。 > Answer: An ancient commentary states: 'It is cognized only by the manas\[-vijñāna\]. This means that the single dharma of time is nominal. The first five and the eighth are all unable to cognize it. The seventh, moreover, constantly cognizes the inner eighth's darśanabhāga as the self, and is furthermore devoid of discrimination; therefore, only the sixth can cognize it. Furthermore, among the four kinds of manovijñāna, only the clear-perceiving manovijñāna cannot cognize it, because time is nominal; that is, in absorption, in dreams, and as solitary dispersed \[thought\]—these three can all cognize it. In terms of the three objects, it is a solitary shadow object.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 68.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.38) - [Next: 68.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.40) - [Up: 68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.68.39) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.68.39) · Pramāṇa