[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 71.11 # 宗鏡錄 71.11 宗鏡錄 71.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [71.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.11) 答。但望自親相分為親所緣緣。非望空華也。若是空華等。但於相分上。妄執生華解。其體是無。若所變相分。其體是有。得成所緣緣。 > Answer: It is an immediate object-condition only in relation to its own immediate nimittabhāga, not in relation to the sky-flower. If it is the sky-flower and the like, it is merely that upon the nimittabhāga one falsely clings to the understanding of a flower arising; its substance is non-existent. But as for the transformed nimittabhāga, its substance is existent and can constitute an object-condition. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 71.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.10) - [Next: 71.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.12) - [Up: 71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.11) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.11) · Pramāṇa