[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 78.17 # 宗鏡錄 78.17 宗鏡錄 78.17 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [78.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78.17) 答。由顛倒故。顛倒是煩惱根本。由識變異。起諸分別。依他性與分別性相應。即是顛倒。煩惱所依止處。顛倒煩惱。又是識變異所依止處。若無互為依止義。則識無變異。於非物中。分別為物。不應有此顛倒。若無煩惱。豈有聖道。故此義亦不成。是故應信離識無別法。 > Answer: It is due to inversion. Inversion is the root of kleśas. Due to the transformation of vijñāna, various discriminations arise. When the paratantra-svabhāva accords with the parikalpita-svabhāva, that is inversion, the resting place of kleśas. Inversion and kleśas are, in turn, the resting place of the transformation of vijñāna. If there were no meaning of mutual reliance, vijñāna would not transform, and discriminating non-things as things—this inversion should not exist. If there were no kleśas, how could there be the noble path? Therefore, that argument is also not established. For this reason, one should have faith that apart from vijñāna there is no separate phenomenon. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 78.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78.16) - [Next: 78.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78.18) - [Up: 78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.78.17) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [攝大乘論釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.mahayanasamgraha!bhasya*zh-paramartha.5.79) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.78.17) · Pramāṇa