[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › 89.5 # 宗鏡錄 89.5 宗鏡錄 89.5 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [89.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89.5) 答。凡論分別。有其三種。一隨念分別。剎那後念續於前念。二計度分別。即。周遍計度。三自性分別。任運緣境不帶名言。今本智證如。但無隨念計度二分別。名無分別。然不妨有自性分別。如人飲水。雖無言說。然冷煖自知。故知亦有軌義。 > Answer: "Generally speaking, when discussing conceptualization (vikalpa), there are three kinds: first, recollection-conceptualization (anusmṛti-vikalpa), where the subsequent thought continues from the previous thought moment by moment; second, calculation-conceptualization (abhinirūpaṇā-vikalpa), which is pervasive calculation; third, self-nature-conceptualization (svabhāva-vikalpa), which spontaneously takes objects as conditions without carrying names and words. Now, when the fundamental wisdom realizes suchness, it is called 'non-conceptual' only because it lacks the two conceptualizations of recollection and calculation. Yet this does not prevent it from having self-nature-conceptualization. It is like a person drinking water: although there is no speech, they naturally know for themselves whether it is cold or warm. Therefore, we know that it also has the meaning of 'model'." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 89.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89.4) - [Next: 89.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89.6) - [Up: 89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.89.5) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.89.5) · Pramāṇa