<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.16 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 12.16

# 宗鏡錄 12.16

English (machine translation) 12.16

- **Language:** English

### [12.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.16)

Question: When the boundless nature of principle completely pervades a single dust speck, are there the nature of principle or no nature of principle in other external phenomenon-locations? If there is principle outside the dust speck, then it is not the entire substance that pervades a single dust speck. If there is no principle outside the dust speck, then it does not completely pervade all phenomena. The meaning is very much in conflict.

- [Previous: 12.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.15)
- [Next: 12.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.17)
- [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.12.16) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.16) · Pramāṇa
