<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.4 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 12.4

# 宗鏡錄 12.4

English (machine translation) 12.4

- **Language:** English

### [12.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.4)

Question: If, according to the wondrous principle of mind-only, all things are without names, then while the designation 'sentient being' may be a provisional contrivance, how could the names of the buddhas be posited in vain?

- [Previous: 12.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.3)
- [Next: 12.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.5)
- [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.12.4) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.12.4) · Pramāṇa
