<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 2.6

# 宗鏡錄 2.6

English (machine translation) 2.6

- **Language:** English

### [2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.6)

Question: The various great sūtras and treatises are complete in their own sections, their chapters and passages orderly, their sentences and meanings distinct. Why rely on an abridged compilation of extensive literature to form an essential summary?

- [Previous: 2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.5)
- [Next: 2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.7)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.2.6) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.2.6) · Pramāṇa
