<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.3 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 52.3

# 宗鏡錄 52.3

English (machine translation) 52.3

- **Language:** English

### [52.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.3)

Question: Why does it not simply take a single feeling (vedanā) and the like as the self, since they are also permanent and one?

- [Previous: 52.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.2)
- [Next: 52.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.4)
- [Up: 52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.3) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.52.3) · Pramāṇa
