[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 57.4 # 宗鏡錄 57.4 English (machine translation) 57.4 - **Language:** English ### [57.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57.4) Question: Merely explaining the eight consciousnesses, such as the ālayavijñāna, already manifests conventional truth. Why speak of eleven kinds of consciousness? Furthermore, pointing ultimately to what they return to, there is only the single true nature. Why then speak of the various consciousnesses in broad and condensed terms? - [Previous: 57.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57.3) - [Next: 57.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57.5) - [Up: 57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57) ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.57.4) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.57.4) · Pramāṇa