[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 6.5 # 宗鏡錄 6.5 English (machine translation) 6.5 - **Language:** English ### [6.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.5) Question: The substance of awakening does not shift, yet conventional designations differ. Since ordinary persons and sages are equal, why do sentient beings not awaken and know? If one says they are not deluded, why do the teachings say that there are delusion and awakening? - [Previous: 6.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.4) - [Next: 6.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.6) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6) ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.6.5) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.6.5) · Pramāṇa