[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 71.11 # 宗鏡錄 71.11 English (machine translation) 71.11 - **Language:** English ### [71.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.11) Answer: It is an immediate object-condition only in relation to its own immediate nimittabhāga, not in relation to the sky-flower. If it is the sky-flower and the like, it is merely that upon the nimittabhāga one falsely clings to the understanding of a flower arising; its substance is non-existent. But as for the transformed nimittabhāga, its substance is existent and can constitute an object-condition. - [Previous: 71.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.10) - [Next: 71.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.12) - [Up: 71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71) ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.11) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.11) · Pramāṇa