[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 71.13 # 宗鏡錄 71.13 English (machine translation) 71.13 - **Language:** English ### [71.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.13) Answer: Such teachings are extremely numerous. Below, distinguishing and analyzing the object-condition in terms of the consciousnesses, the commentary says: 'The eighth exists for the seventh; the seventh does not exist for the eighth; because the remaining seven are not the archetypes (bimbas) relied upon by the eighth.' For instance, when the seventh cognizes the darśanabhāga of the eighth, is that not a quality-attached object acting as an object-condition? And further, when the commentary states: 'The sixth does not exist for the five; the remaining five exist for that \[sixth\]', that is also a quality-attached object acting as an object-condition. Moreover, the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhiśāstra states: 'The immediate object-condition is definitively present in the arising of all cittas; without an internal object of contemplation and reliance, it is definitely unable to arise.' The proofs are extremely numerous and cannot be cited exhaustively. - [Previous: 71.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.12) - [Next: 71.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.14) - [Up: 71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71) ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.13) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.13) · Pramāṇa