<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.4 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 71.4

# 宗鏡錄 71.4

English (machine translation) 71.4

- **Language:** English

### [71.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.4)

Question: Since the imaginary (parikalpita) is also devoid of substance and cannot produce citta, how can it be called an object-condition (ālambanapratyaya)?

- [Previous: 71.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.3)
- [Next: 71.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.5)
- [Up: 71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.71.4) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.71.4) · Pramāṇa
