<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.26 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 80.26

# 宗鏡錄 80.26

English (machine translation) 80.26

- **Language:** English

### [80.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.26)

Question: If the Buddha-nature is definitively said to exist or not exist, it results in the views of annihilationism or eternalism. How is it to be realized so that the principle accords with the direct cause?

- [Previous: 80.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.25)
- [Next: 80.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.27)
- [Up: 80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.80.26) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.80.26) · Pramāṇa
