<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.16 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt) › 85.16

# 宗鏡錄 85.16

English (machine translation) 85.16

- **Language:** English

### [85.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.16)

Question: Entering the gate of vijñaptimātra, one contemplates that all objects are naturally signless. What need is there to speak further of refuting characteristics to reveal the principle, and moreover of abandoning existence to contemplate emptiness? If there is a tenet to be refuted, then one establishes a principle capable of making it empty. If an empty phenomenon is retained, it turns back into a cause for having characteristics. If one clings to the gate of contemplation, how can it accord with the unconditioned Path?

- [Previous: 85.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.15)
- [Next: 85.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.17)
- [Up: 85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85)

## Linked texts (1)

- [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.85.16) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016~en-mt.85.16) · Pramāṇa
