<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.21 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [佛祖統紀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035) › 12.21

# 佛祖統紀 12.21

佛祖統紀 12.21

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [12.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.21)

法師嗣謙。蚤居法智輪下。因有人謂三千是假法以之為難。時廣智謂。三千不離實相。實相即是三諦則三諦皆三千也。師服其說。後著修性辨訛。首明三千不專俗諦。及廣智答淨覺書。乃引師以為證。

> Dharma Master Siqian early on dwelt beneath the wheel of Fazhi. Because someone raised a challenge asserting that the 'three thousand \[realms\]' are provisional phenomena, Guangzhi stated at the time: 'The three thousand are not separate from the true aspect. The true aspect is none other than the three truths; therefore, the three truths are all the three thousand.' The Master accepted his explanation. Later, he composed \*Rectifying Errors on Cultivation and Nature\*, demonstrating first that the three thousand do not pertain exclusively to conventional truth. When Guangzhi replied to Jingjue in a letter, he cited the Master as corroborating evidence.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 12.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.20)
- [Next: 12.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.22)
- [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035~en-mt.12.21) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.12.21) · Pramāṇa
