[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [佛祖統紀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035) › 14.47 # 佛祖統紀 14.47 佛祖統紀 14.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [14.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14.47) 述曰。昉師辨祖謂。智炬撰寶林傳詭說百端。如達磨隻履西歸立雪斷臂等。事與南山續高僧傳多不同（云云）。世又謂壇經談性不異吾宗。而於念佛求往西方。有以貶斥。義天言遼國焚棄二書者。蓋以此也。 > The narrator says: Master Fang, in his Bianzu (Distinguishing the Patriarchs), stated that when Zhiju composed the Baolin zhuan, it contained a hundred kinds of deceitful claims, such as Bodhidharma returning to the west with a single shoe, or standing in the snow and cutting off an arm, matters that are largely at variance with the Xu Gaoseng zhuan of Nanshan, and so forth. Furthermore, people in the world say that while the Platform Sūtra speaks of nature no differently from our school, it disparages and rejects chanting the Buddha's name to seek rebirth in the Western Pure Land. That Ŭich'ŏn said the Liao state burned and discarded the two books was presumably for these reasons. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 14.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14.46) - [Next: 14.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14.48) - [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035~en-mt.14.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2035.14.47) · Pramāṇa