<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.13 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [廣弘明集](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103) › 21.13

# 廣弘明集 21.13

廣弘明集 21.13

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [21.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.13)

二諦理實深玄。自非虛懷。無以通其弘遠。明道之方。其由非一。舉要論之不出境智。或時以境明義。或時以智顯行。至於二諦即是就境明義。若迷其方三有不絕。若達其致萬累斯遣。所言二諦者。一是真諦。二名俗諦。真諦亦名第一義諦。俗諦亦名世諦。真諦俗諦以定體立名。第一義諦世諦以褒貶立目。若以次第言說。應云一真諦。二俗諦。一與二合。數則為三。非直數過於二。亦名有前後。於義非便。真既不因俗而有。俗亦不由真而生。正可得言一真一俗。真者是實義。即是平等更無異法。能為雜間。俗者即是集義。此法得生。浮偽起作。第一義者。就無生境中別立美名。言此法最勝最妙無能及者。世者以隔別為義。生滅流動無有住相。涅槃經言。出世人所知名第一義諦。世人所知名為世諦。此即文證褒貶之理。二諦立名差別不同。真俗世等以一義說。第一義諦以二義說。正言此理德既第一義亦第一。世既浮偽更無有義。所以但立世名。諦者以審實為義。真諦審實是真。俗諦審實是俗。真諦離有離無。俗諦即有即無。即有即無斯是假名。離有離無此為中道。真是中道。以不生為體。俗既假名。以生法為體。

> The principle of the Two Truths is truly deep and profound. Unless one has an open mind, there is no way to penetrate its vastness and distance. The methods of clarifying the Way do not originate from a single source; to state the essentials, they do not go beyond the sphere of objects and wisdom. Sometimes one clarifies meaning by means of the objective sphere; sometimes one reveals practice by means of wisdom. As for the Two Truths, they mean clarifying meaning with reference to the objective sphere. If one is deluded about its orientation, the three realms of existence do not cease; if one penetrates its purport, the myriad entanglements are all dispelled. As for what are called the Two Truths: the first is the ultimate truth, and the second is called the conventional truth. The ultimate truth is also called the supreme truth; the conventional truth is also called the worldly truth. 'Ultimate truth' and 'conventional truth' are established as names according to their fixed nature; 'supreme truth' and 'worldly truth' are established as designations by way of praise and deprecation. If speaking in terms of sequence, one should say first the ultimate truth, second the conventional truth. When one and two are joined, the number becomes three; not only does the number exceed two, but the names also have before and after, which is not suitable in meaning. The ultimate does not exist because of the conventional, nor is the conventional born due to the ultimate. One can properly say one ultimate and one conventional. 'Ultimate' means the real: it is equality, and there is no other dharma that can intermingle with it. 'Conventional' means gathering: this dharma is able to arise, floating, false, and constructed. 'Supreme' is a distinct praise established within the unarisen realm, stating that this dharma is most superior and most wondrous, with none able to equal it. 'Worldly' takes division as its meaning: arising, ceasing, and flowing without any abiding mark. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra says: 'What is known by people who transcend the world is called the supreme truth; what is known by worldly people is called the worldly truth.' This is textual evidence for the principle of praise and deprecation. The establishment of the names of the Two Truths has distinct differences. 'Ultimate', 'conventional', 'worldly', and so forth are spoken of with a single meaning; 'supreme truth' is spoken of with two meanings, stating that this principle's virtue is both supreme and its meaning is also supreme. Since the worldly is floating and false, it has no real meaning; therefore, only the name 'world' is established. 'Truth' has the meaning of being examined and real: the ultimate truth is examined and real as ultimate; the conventional truth is examined and real as conventional. The ultimate truth is free from existence and free from non-existence; the conventional truth is both existent and non-existent. Being both existent and non-existent is a provisional designation; being free from existence and free from non-existence is the Middle Way. The ultimate is the Middle Way, taking non-arising as its essence; since the conventional is a provisional designation, it takes arising dharmas as its essence.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 21.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.12)
- [Next: 21.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.14)
- [Up: 21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103~en-mt.21.13) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.21.13) · Pramāṇa
