<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.72 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [廣弘明集](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103) › 8.72

# 廣弘明集 8.72

廣弘明集 8.72

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.72)

問。敬尋道家。厥品有三。一者老子無為。二者神仙餌服。三者符錄禁厭。就其章式大有精麁。麁者厭人殺鬼。精者練屍延壽。更有青錄。受須金帛。王侯受之則延年益祚。庶人受之則輕健少疾。君何不論惟貶鄙者。

> Question: Upon respectful examination of the Daoist school, its grades are three: the first is Laozi's non-action (asaṃskṛta); the second is the ingestion \[of elixirs\] by divine immortals; the third is talismans, registers, and incantatory suppressions. As for the forms of their petitions, there are gross and refined varieties: the gross suppress men and kill ghosts; the refined refine the corpse and prolong life. Furthermore, there are Azure Registers: receiving them requires gold and silk. If kings and nobles receive them, their years are lengthened and their fortune augmented; if commoners receive them, they become light, robust, and rarely ill. Why do you not discuss these, but only disparage the base ones?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.71)
- [Next: 8.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.73)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103~en-mt.8.72) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2103.8.72) · Pramāṇa
