Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

北山錄 8.2

北山錄 8.2

Language
Classical Chinese

8.2.1

覺皇有業智力(佛有無漏淨業。 八識四智等。 又示相門中有九業報。 一梵志女孫陀利謗佛。 二旃遮婆女繫木杅謗佛懷姙。 三提婆達多推山厭佛。 四迸木槍刺佛足。 五琉璃王害釋種佛亦頭痛。 六受阿耆達多婆羅門請佛九十日食馬麥。 七冷風動佛背痛入六年苦行。 九入婆羅聚落乞食空鉢而廻。 又冬至前後八日夜寒索衣。 又患熱令阿難在後執扇等)哀哉有生貌異音殊苦樂愚智尊卑壽夭。 故大昭業理。 用啟人惑(良由起異類見。 造異類業受異類報也)小聖之所不及。 況非聖者乎。 而有譸張忿懫者(譸張誑也。 忿儨怒也)自謂得一之見人莫吾之若也所謂命矣。 非業之由也(有一類背悷之。 徒不信業報。 皆言天命者也)禮曰。 天命之謂性。 得之自是。 不得之自是。 以聽天命(外典稱業為天命。 子云。 命矣。 夫修短之性命。 皆自是天之所注也)仲尼曰。 道之將行也歟命也。 道之將廢也歟命也。 公伯僚其如命何(公伯僚魯人毀仲尼於叔孫武叔夫子故有是言也)子夏曰。 死生有命。 富貴在天(死生總報業。 富貴別報業)魯公欲見孟子(魯平公將見孟軻。 以其賢德故也)嬖人臧倉毀於公而止。 孟子聞之曰。 天也(孟子云。 君不見我。 自是天命未會。 非臧倉能止)是知由業故不然矣(以緣業為天命也)且仁者克己。 不仁者害人。 仁者危甚累棋。 不仁者安過覆盂(積善殃咎。 若比干之徒。 為惡諧偶。 若曹操之類)禍福篾徵。 其在耳目。 故唐虞聖德。 但自一己(翼善傳聖。 曰堯以丹朱不肖而絕。 仁聖盛明。 曰舜以商均不嗣而絕也)厲幽昏淫。 祚延七百(暴虐無親曰厲。 壅遏不通曰幽。 皆周王也。 雖昏猶延數世)三桓陵僭。 世執魯政(季孫上卿。 叔孫中卿。 孟孫下卿)夷吾匡輔。 嗣絕齊史(夷吾齊管仲也。 佐桓公九合諸侯。 尊獎王室。 齊國音無後嗣也)騷為天問(三閭大夫屈原也。 著離騷經。 故謂騷人有天問也)班賦通幽(班固。 字孟堅。 著通幽賦。 傷賢良不用也。 並在文選也)李推運命。 其不為此歟(李蕭遠有運命論也)故金仙之門。 其孰能辯之。 由是群言師師。 若妖厲憑舌(前有譸張之士述之。 皆言是命。 不是於業。 後之承信。 若巫覡之傳妖厲也)使君子大人聞之。 猶若投杼(曾參母織。 有告參殺人。 母初不信。 再告。 母疑。 三告。 母投杼而走。 以參仁孝。 報者不過三。 母尚信之。 今此不經之言。 傳者不過三。 達人君子亦須信之。 況餘者)時袒右肩士。 愀然不懌。 徂履礪刃。 將斬其疑(時有偏祖釋子。 洞明業理。 覩其迷謬。 遂礪智鋒。 將決其疑網也)曰若稱命不稱業。 其蔽也固(蔽塞固執也)夫業者生乎運動者也(運動者即發行之謂也)動有違順(善與善順。 惡與善違)成乎善惡(福業為善。 非福為惡)善惡鍾乎報施(施戒善相應。 殺盜惡際會)然後有性命窮通生焉(於總報外有窮通。 貧富脩短聰暗端正醜陋。 皆名別報業也)但機運之業。 有於輕重。 而性命之報。 有於今後(順現業名今重也。 順生順後業名後則輕也)必若弗假乎業。 而受命惟天。 則何天道之賦命。 而不均其厚薄(若人等皆由天命。 何故其道不均)必若業唯運動。 不能招命。 則祭豈有福。 暴豈有傷乎(今以宿行定招名業。 善惡現感名命。 若唯有業者則合宿緣。 感無移改豈得現見。 祭祀者獲福。 兇暴者受殃。 皆非宿業所感也祀者但是冥助而已。 兇暴者亦是順現別報也)詩曰。 莫莫葛藟。 施于條枚。 豈弟君子。 求福不回。 斯言何設歟(詩大雅旱麓之卒章也。 旱山名。 麓足也。 取其不違先祖求福之道。 回違也)然往世之業有定不定。 而感今世性命有變不變(業於時報有定不定。 性命有變不變。

The Enlightened Sovereign possesses the power of the knowledge of karma (The Buddha has untainted pure karma, the eight consciousnesses, the four wisdoms, and so forth. Furthermore, in the approach of manifesting marks, there are nine karmic retributions: first, the female brahmin Sundarī slandering the Buddha; second, the female Ciñcā tying a wooden bowl to slander the Buddha as having impregnated her; third, Devadatta pushing down a mountain to crush the Buddha; fourth, a splinter of wood stabbing the Buddha's foot; fifth, King Virūḍhaka slaughtering the Śākya clan and the Buddha also suffering a headache; sixth, accepting the invitation of the brahmin Agnidatta where the Buddha ate horse oats for ninety days; seventh, cold winds agitating the Buddha's back pain and entering into six years of asceticism; [eighth, ...]; ninth, entering a brahmin village to beg for food and returning with an empty bowl. Also, for eight days and nights around the winter solstice, feeling cold and asking for clothes; and suffering from heat and ordering Ānanda to stand behind and hold a fan, and so forth). Alas, living beings differ in appearance, vary in voice, experience misery or joy, are foolish or wise, noble or base, long-lived or short-lived. Therefore, he greatly illuminated the principle of karma in order to dispel human delusions (This truly stems from giving rise to diverse views, creating diverse karma, and receiving diverse retributions). Lesser sages cannot reach it, how much less those who are not sages! Yet there are deceitful and resentful people (Zhourzhang means deceitful. Fenzhi means angry) who presume themselves to possess the insight of having attained the One, claiming, "No one is my equal; this is what is called destiny! It does not stem from karma" (There is a class of perverse individuals who do not believe in karmic retribution and all claim it is heavenly destiny). The Rites say: "What Heaven ordains is called human nature. Obtaining it comes naturally; not obtaining it comes naturally, according with heavenly destiny" (Outer scriptures refer to karma as heavenly destiny. Confucius said: "It is destiny!" Indeed, the nature and destiny of longevity or brevity are all naturally determined by Heaven). Zhongni said: "If the Dao is to prevail, it is destiny; if the Dao is to fall into disuse, it is destiny. What can Gongbo Liao do against destiny?" (Gongbo Liao was a man of Lu who slandered Zhongni to Shusun Wushu, hence the Master spoke these words). Zixia said: "Life and death have their destiny; wealth and honor reside with Heaven" (Life and death are collective retributive karma; wealth and honor are particular retributive karma). Duke Ping of Lu wished to see Mencius (Duke Ping of Lu was about to see Meng Ke because of his virtue and worthiness); his favorite, Zang Cang, slandered Mencius to the Duke, and so he stopped. When Mencius heard this, he said: "It is Heaven!" (Mencius said: "That the ruler did not see me is naturally because heavenly destiny had not yet converged; it was not that Zang Cang was able to prevent it"). From this, we know that because it stems from karma, it is not so (They take karmic conditions to be heavenly destiny). Moreover, the benevolent overcome themselves, while the unbenevolent harm others. The benevolent are in greater peril than a stack of chess pieces, while the unbenevolent are more secure than an overturned bowl (Accumulating good brings misfortune and blame, like the comrades of Bi Gan; doing evil brings success and harmony, like the likes of Cao Cao). Signs of fortune and misfortune are missing, right before our eyes and ears. Thus, the sagely virtue of Tang and Yu was confined to their own single persons (Extending goodness and transmitting the sagely: it is said Yao ended it because Danzhu was unworthy; benevolence and sageliness were flourishing and bright: it is said Shun ended it because Shangjun could not carry on the succession). Li and You were dark and licentious, yet their reign lasted seven hundred years (Cruel and unloving is called Li; obstructive and blocked is called You; both were kings of the Zhou. Though benighted, they still prolonged it for several reigns). The Three Huan clans encroached and usurped, holding the government of Lu for generations (Jisun was the upper minister, Shusun was the middle minister, and Mengsun was the lower minister). Yiwu rectified and assisted, but his lineage was cut off in the annals of Qi (Yiwu was Guan Zhong of Qi; he aided Duke Huan in uniting the feudal lords nine times and honoring the royal house, yet in Qi his voice left no descendants). The Sao poet composed "Heavenly Questions" (Qu Yuan was the Grand Master of the Three Royal Clans; he composed the Lisao Jing, hence he is called the Sao poet who had the "Heavenly Questions"); Ban Gu wrote the rhapsody "Penetrating the Obscure" (Ban Gu, styled Mengjian, composed the Rhapsody on Penetrating the Obscure, lamenting that the worthy and good were not employed; both are in the Wenxuan); Li Xiaoyuan inferred fortune and destiny—was it not on account of this? (Li Xiaoyuan had the Treatise on Fortune and Destiny). Therefore, among the gates of the Golden Immortal, who can distinguish this? From this, the multitude of discourses follow one after another, as if demons and wraiths were possessing their tongues (Earlier deceitful scholars narrated this, all stating it was destiny and not karma; later people accepted and believed it, like shamans transmitting demons and wraiths). If a gentleman or great person hears it, it is still like the dropping of the shuttle (Zeng Shen's mother was weaving. Someone told her Shen had killed a person. At first, the mother did not believe it. When told a second time, the mother doubted. When told a third time, the mother threw down the shuttle and ran. Because of Shen's benevolence and filiality, the reporters did not exceed three, and even his mother believed it. Now, with these unorthodox words, when transmitters do not exceed three, even enlightened men and gentlemen must come to believe them, how much more so the rest!). At that time, a scholar baring his right shoulder looked saddened and displeased; stepping forward with shoes and sharpening his blade, he was about to sever their doubts (At that time, there was a Śākya disciple baring his shoulder who thoroughly understood the principle of karma; seeing their confusion and error, he sharpened the blade of wisdom, about to resolve the net of their doubts). He said: If you speak of destiny and do not speak of karma, your obstruction is firm (Obstruction means obstinacy). Now, karma arises from movement and action (Movement and action refers to initiating deeds); action has conformity and opposition (Goodness conforms with goodness; evil opposes goodness); they consummate into good and bad (Meritorious karma is good; unmeritorious is bad). Good and bad are concentrated in retribution and dispensation (Charity and precepts correspond to good; killing and stealing converge in evil). Only thereafter are nature, destiny, failure, and success born from them (Apart from collective retribution, there are failure and success, poverty and wealth, long life and short, cleverness and dullness, uprightness and ugliness; all are named particular retributive karma). However, the karma of opportune workings has degrees of lightness and heaviness, and the retribution of nature and destiny has occurrence in the present or the future (Karma experienced in the present life is called present and heavy; karma experienced in the next life or subsequent lives is called future and light). If indeed it does not rely on karma and receiving destiny belongs solely to Heaven, then why would the Heavenly Dao confer destiny without equalizing its generosity and meagerness? (If all people are determined by heavenly destiny, why is its way not equal?). If indeed karma were only movement and action and could not summon destiny, then how could sacrifice bring blessing, or brutality bring injury? (Now, taking past actions that determinately summon retribution is named karma; good and evil actualized in the present is named destiny. If there were only karma, then conforming to past conditions, the actualization would have no alteration; how could one see in the present that those who sacrifice obtain blessings and the violent suffer misfortune? These are not what past karma has summoned; sacrifices are merely unseen assistance, and the violent also face particular retributions experienced in the present). The Odes say: 'Dense is the creeping kudzuvine, spreading over the branches and boughs. Joyful and courteous is the gentleman, seeking blessing without deviance.' Why was this statement made? (This is the final stanza of 'Hanlu' in the Daya of the Odes. Han is the name of a mountain; lu means its foot. It takes not violating the ancestors' way of seeking blessing; hui means violating). However, the karma of past lifetimes has the determinate and indeterminate, and the present lifetime's nature and destiny it influences has the changeable and unchangeable (Karma has determinate and indeterminate in terms of time and retribution; nature and destiny have the changeable and unchangeable).

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

8.2.2

若順現變為蛇等。 別報則變。 總報不變也)其業若定。 所感之命確乎不改。 其業若不定。 而所感之命則可損益之耳(如憑善力轉重令輕等惡亦如是)然今世之業有定不定。 而令昔世所感性命有變不變。 其業若定。 能改昔因(如善業能改昔世之惡日)不定之命致有窮通(不定之命。 謂別報也。 本以惡故窮。 今以善力改之故通也)其業若不定。 則一乎否泰耳(謂不定能改也)夫舍利弗.阿那律。 遇佛為法醫。 遇耆婆為世醫而不蠲於宿瘵(瘵病也。 如舍利弗血痢。 良醫云可食藕。 乃令目連往漫陀羅池中取藕食之等。 阿那律喪目等。 皆宿業也)顏回.閔損。 遇孔丘著德行。 遇諸侯務賢智。 而不去其貧夭。 蓋往世所感之命定也。 故今世行善。 不能益之也(顏回。 字子淵。 弟子魯人也。 顏路之子。 家貧。 三十早亡。 閔損。 字子騫亦魯人。 有孝行家貧。 遭後母所苦。 為李氏家費宰)跋難陀忮求而福盛(跋難陀比丘。 富盛有金錢數億也)阿育王酷恣而威強(育王殺戮無度。 置地獄等。 而威震海隅。 遇沙門毱多化之。 建八萬四千塔也)季氏出君死於牖下(季桓子逐出魯昭公音死於乾侯而攝祭祀終獲死於魯國)盜跖餔腸終於上壽(盜跖為賊。 於東陵日殺行人。 取心肝為餔。 孔子不能化之。 竟獲其死也)蓋往世所感之命定也。 今世不善不能損之也(此以宿有善業現。 惡不能掩之也)末利獻食為國夫人(末利夫人。 釋官庶生極醜。 父王不欲見。 乃咨蹉供佛。 念誦不暇。 佛為見身。 變獲端嚴。 波斯匿王取為夫人)舡板讓死為海神授命(大莊嚴論說。 有比丘。 泛海遇風損舡。 少年比丘獲一舡板。 見上座沒。 念云。 佛今敬上座。 遂以板讓之。 海神覩見歡喜。 俱推出海而得存活也)趙盾愍於翳桑(趙宣子出見翳桑餓人問之。 云不食三日矣。 乃取食以飼之。 後為晉靈嗾獓咬之。 翳桑靈輒殺獓扶輪救之而出也)漂母哀於淮陰(淮陰侯韓信。 未遇飢甚。 見老母漂絮投之。 母餉之。 後佐漢封淮陰侯。 母已死。 開墳以千金投內也)皆今世善業之定也。 往世之命不定。 故能變衰從盛也(自末利已下。 此順現善業也)樵客指熊而臂落(經律異相云。 有樵夫入山。 值大雪寒極。 白熊收入窟。 至雪霽下山見獵人。 刀引之示其熊處。 舉手指之。 隨指臂落也)比丘啖𮌉而腸穿(有逐羊奔寺見比丘指示之乃殺之以䏑啖比丘食已䏑遍於皮下走穿腸而卒。 出辯正論)里克見討於弑君(晉獻公寵孋姬。 而逐群公子。 殺申生太子立奚齊。 里克殺之。 國人又立卓子。 克又殺之而迎夷吾立之。 是為惠公。 惠公至自秦。 謂里克曰。 子殺二君與一大夫。 謂荀息也。 乃自殺。 即惠公討之故也)張祿逞志於魏相(張祿。 范睢也。 與須賈入秦。 秦悅之。 須賈歸譖之於魏齊。 魏齊乃飲酒。 次打之齒折。 沈溷中活而奔秦。 改稱張祿。 秦拜為相。 後謀收魏。 魏齊令須賈奉使祿。 乃令須賈作驢。 仍今取魏齊。 魏齊出奔至死。 竟喪於魏也)皆今世不善業之定也(此皆順現業不善之報也)往世之命不定。 故能化存為亡也(前世壽本未盡為今世業令盡而受現果故也)提婆達多害聖出足血(推山傷佛足)破僧倫必受泥犁之一劫。 蓋方生不善業之定也(亦順現不善定業也)阿闍世弑父。 見于佛。 信于法。 免無擇之大苦(阿闍世王弑父頻婆娑羅王。 地獄苦見身患惡瘡。 歸心告佛。 佛以光照而瘡愈。 反為說法。 免地獄之苦也。 無擇獄名。 不擇善惡故也)蓋方生不善業之不定也(因懺悔而罪滅矣。 此乃時報俱不定也)故顏閔之貧夭。 酬往因之不善。 其德行可為來生之善報。 季跖之富壽。 酬往因之善業。 其逆暴可為來生之重苦。 誠不足疑矣。 夫不龜手藥是一。

If [karma to be experienced] in the present life turns one into a snake or the like, the individual retribution changes, but the collective retribution does not change.) If that karma is fixed, the destiny evoked by it is firm and unalterable. If that karma is not fixed, the destiny evoked by it can be diminished or increased. (As when, relying on the power of goodness, heavy [karma] is turned into light; evil is likewise.) However, karma of the present life may be fixed or unfixed, causing the nature and lifespan evoked by past lives to change or not change. If that karma is fixed, it can alter past causes. (As when good karma can alter the evil days of past lives.) An unfixed destiny brings about poverty or success. (An unfixed destiny refers to individual retribution. Originally, because of evil, one was in poverty; now, altered by the power of goodness, one achieves success.) If that karma is unfixed, it is simply a matter of adversity or prosperity. (Meaning that what is unfixed can be altered.) Indeed, Śāriputra and Aniruddha encountered the Buddha as a physician of the Dharma and Jīvaka as a worldly physician, yet this did not dispel their chronic past ailments. (Ailments mean illnesses. For instance, when Śāriputra suffered from bloody dysentery, a fine physician said he could eat lotus root; Maudgalyāyana was then sent to Lake Mandākinī to fetch lotus root for him to eat. Aniruddha lost his sight, and so forth; all were past karma.) Yan Hui and Min Sun encountered Kong Qiu and excelled in virtuous conduct, and encountered the feudal lords who prized worth and wisdom, yet this did not remove their poverty and early death. This is because the destiny evoked by past lives was fixed; therefore, practicing goodness in the present life could not augment it. (Yan Hui, courtesy name Ziyuan, was a disciple from Lu. He was the son of Yan Lu. His family was poor, and he died early at the age of thirty. Min Sun, courtesy name Ziqian, was also from Lu. He possessed filial conduct; his family was poor, and he suffered abuse from his stepmother. He served as magistrate of Bi for the Jisun clan.) Upananda was jealous and acquisitive, yet his blessings flourished. (The monk Upananda was wealthy and prosperous, possessing hundreds of millions in money.) King Aśoka was cruel and unrestrained, yet his majesty was formidable. (King Aśoka slaughtered without limit, establishing hells and the like, yet his majesty shook the coastal regions. Encountering the śramaṇa Upagupta, he was converted by him and erected eighty-four thousand stupas.) The Ji clan expelled their lord, yet died beneath his own window. (Ji Huanzi drove out Duke Zhao of Lu, who died in Qianhou; while Ji took charge of the sacrifices, he ultimately managed to die [peacefully] in the state of Lu.) Robber Zhi feasted on human intestines, yet lived to the highest old age. (Robber Zhi was a bandit; at Dongling he slaughtered travelers daily, taking their hearts and livers for food. Confucius could not convert him, yet he ultimately lived out his days.) This is because the destiny evoked by past lives was fixed; evil in the present life could not diminish it. (This is because when good karma from the past exists, present evil cannot eclipse it.) Mallikā offered food and became queen consort of the realm. (Lady Mallikā was of the Śākya clan, born of a concubine and extremely ugly; her royal father did not wish to see her. She then lamented and made offerings to the Buddha, chanting without cease. The Buddha manifested his body for her, and her appearance transformed to become dignified. King Prasenajit took her as his consort.) Relinquishing a ship's plank unto death, one was granted life by the sea deity. (The Great Treatise on the Adornment of the Sutras says that there was a monk who sailed the sea and met a wind that wrecked the ship. A young monk obtained a ship's plank; seeing a senior monk sinking, he thought: 'The Buddha now commands respect for seniors,' and thereupon yielded the plank to him. The sea deity saw this with delight, and pushed both of them out of the sea so they survived.) Zhao Dun showed pity at Yisang. (Zhao Xuanzi went out and saw a starving man at Yisang; when he questioned him, the man said he had not eaten for three days. He then fetched food to feed him. Later, Duke Ling of Jin set a ferocious dog to bite him; Ling Zhe of Yisang killed the dog, steadied the chariot wheels, and rescued him so he could escape.) The washerwoman showed compassion at Huaiyin. (Before Han Xin, the Marquis of Huaiyin, met his opportunity, he was utterly famished. Seeing an old woman bleaching silk floss, he went to her, and the woman fed him. Later, he aided the Han and was enfeoffed as the Marquis of Huaiyin; when the woman had already died, he opened her tomb and cast a thousand pieces of gold inside.) All of these are the fixed good karma of the present life. Because the destiny from past lives was not fixed, they could turn decline into prosperity. (From Mallikā downward, these are all good karma experienced in the present life.) A woodcutter pointed out a bear and his arm dropped off. (The Jinglü yixiang says that a woodcutter went into the mountains, encountered heavy snow and extreme cold, and a white bear took him into its den. When the snow cleared, he went down the mountain and saw a hunter. Drawing a knife, [the hunter] had him point out the bear's lair; as he raised his finger to point it out, his arm fell off.) A monk ate mutton and his intestines were pierced through. (Someone chasing a sheep ran to a monastery and saw a monk who pointed it out to him; he then slaughtered it and fed the meat to the monk. After the monk ate it, the meat spread beneath his skin, ran through and pierced his intestines, and he died. This comes from the Bianzheng lun.) Li Ke was executed for regicide. (Duke Xian of Jin doted on Li Ji, banished all the princes, and killed the crown prince Shensheng, setting up Xiqi. Li Ke killed him. The people of the state then established Zhuozi; Ke also killed him, and welcomed Yiwu to set him up. This was Duke Hui. Duke Hui arrived from Qin and said to Li Ke: 'You killed two lords and one grand master'—meaning Xun Xi. He then killed himself, which was Duke Hui's retribution against him.) Zhang Lu gave rein to his ambitions over the minister of Wei. (Zhang Lu was Fan Sui. He entered Qin with Xu Jia; Qin was pleased with him. Xu Jia returned and slandered him to Wei Qi. Wei Qi was drinking wine and subsequently beat him until his teeth were broken; he was thrown into a latrine, but survived and fled to Qin, changing his name to Zhang Lu. Qin appointed him chancellor. Later, plotting to capture Wei, Wei Qi sent Xu Jia as an envoy; Lu then made Xu Jia act as a donkey, and still demanded the capture of Wei Qi. Wei Qi fled into exile until death, ultimately perishing in Wei.) All of these are the fixed bad karma of the present life. (These are all retributions for bad karma experienced in the present life.) Because destiny from past lives was not fixed, it could transform survival into death. (The lifespan from the previous life was originally not exhausted, but karma of the present life brought it to an end, so they received present retribution.) Devadatta harmed the Sage and drew blood from his foot. (Rolling down a boulder, he injured the Buddha's foot.) Disrupting the monastic community, he was bound to suffer a kalpa in Niraya. This is the fixed nature of bad karma for the next birth. (This is also fixed bad karma experienced in the present life.) Ajātaśatru killed his father, yet upon seeing the Buddha and believing in the Dharma, he was spared the great torment of Avīci. (King Ajātaśatru killed his father, King Bimbisāra. When the torments of hell appeared on his body as malignant sores, he turned his heart toward and pleaded to the Buddha. The Buddha illuminated him with light and his sores healed; he then preached the Dharma for him, freeing him from the torments of hell. 'Wuze' is the name of a hell, so called because it does not distinguish good from evil.) This is the unfixed nature of bad karma for the next birth. (Because of repentance, his guilt was extinguished. This is because both time and retribution were unfixed.) Therefore, the poverty and early death of Yan Hui and Min Sun repaid the evil of past causes, while their virtuous conduct can become good retribution in future lives. The wealth and longevity of the Ji clan and Robber Zhi repaid the good karma of past causes, while their rebellious cruelty can become heavy suffering in future lives. There is truly no reason to doubt this. The salve for chapped hands is one and the same.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

8.2.3

而榮賤各異(龜皴坼也。 有賣藥以治之。 所獲甚少。 南人鬻其方。 歸而獻於君。 值征所用。 大得其祿也。 出莊子)削諸侯地是一。 而興亡不同(秦始皇削奪諸侯地而不封。 漢軍入秦。 無救者而亡也。 麗食其見漢王勸令封諸侯地。 及張良至。 遽止之。 於帳中借筋為籌畫之言不可。 遂不封。 漢果興也)實由機運有工拙。 而性命有可易不可易也。 故君子知運命之不可易。 而樂天知命。 小人不知則踰己躁動(不知道無以為君子)是以禍福安危居然可見矣。 其有謂吉凶恒理由命不由運者。 斯不足斷矣(運有否泰吉凶山人者也)夫冬草覆而不死。 何甞不由運乎(由運用而可免也)有以性能則命通由運不由命者。 斯亦不足斷矣(有便倚運動不信宿。 業則亦不可也)夫寒木溉而不滋(滋潤灌也。 如古柏澆水。 豈便滋茂。 蓋力堅故也)何甞不由命乎。 夫兩信完。 方可謂之達奧。 是以信有運則業之信矣。 信有命則果之信矣(運乃業因。 命則業果)信運命而不信業果者。 何異聞朝三暮四則怒。 聞朝四暮三則喜乎(莊子云。 如云朝三暮四之言。 眾狙皆怒。 却云朝四暮三。 則眾狙盡喜。 而不知名異而事同者也)故此方先聖儒。 雖不顯言於業果。 而陰以運命[阿-可+(止/少/馬)]之(隲定也。 以運命暗定業理故也)名殊而義一耳。 易曰。 知幾其神乎。 莊氏云。 萬物出於幾。 陰符云。 心生於幾死於幾(本作物見物而幾生也。 心能發幾。 目能見幾。 生死之心在於物。 成敗之幾見於目也。 張湛云。 幾者群有之始。 動之所崇也)幾者動之微。 蓋言於業運也。 或曰業興於動其報理均。 曷有輕重定不定乎(所發業是同。 何有輕重等受報不定者乎)曰。 心有喜怒。 事有恩酷(能發之心行有不同)故形不忍乎色。 逞炮烙于心(紂之無道。 改炮烙之刑。 行刳斮之虐。 此業之重也)而書云。 宥過無大刑過無小(宥放也。 不以罪大而不赦不以過小而不殺也)經云。 為團鐵小亦沈水。 為鉢鐵大亦能浮。 莫不以是(業雖重而悔猛亦免。 業雖輕而不懺亦受)又若以三業三時合離為八(身口意單名離三業俱等名合離合二種兼三業三時為入三時三世也)兼之則重。 差之則輕(三業同發名重。 不同發名輕)輕則不定。 重乃定矣。 由是瓶沙餒於逆子(瓶沙即頻婆娑羅王)釋黨死於凶王(琉璃王也)堯聰明而洪水(湯湯洪水蕩蕩懷山襄陵下民昏墊等)湯仁德而大旱(湯以仁德而有天下。 七年大旱。 禱於桑林等也)張毅.單豹.以養求生。 俱不能生(齊人張毅者。 畏慎之士也。 見高門懸簿無不走也。 年四十以內熱之病而卒。 此過之於躁滯外也。 單豹者。 魯人。 巖居飲水不與民共利。 年七十而有嬰兒之色。 不幸遇餓虎食之。 此滯於內也。 豹養其內。 虎食其外。 毅養其外。 病攻其內。 俱求生不得生也)薄俱羅周后稷。 不以養求生。 俱反其生。 蓋運命之定也(薄俱羅。 此云善容。 曾施一訶梨勒。 九十一劫不患頭痛。 遭後母方便殺之。 經五難不死。 出家後。 目不視女人。 身不入尼寺。 不為女人說一句法。 無憂王知其少欲。 施其塔一金錢。 湧地不受也。 周后稷。 帝嚳之子。 姜原所生。 生而毛。 遂棄之深山寒氷陋巷。 三棄不死。 因名棄。 善播種仕堯。 至十五代孫文王得天下)黑風飄而獲濟(有商人入海。 遇黑風飄入羅剎鬼國。 俱念佛而皆獲免也)富羅正而長謝(有比丘。 見輪王威勢愛之。 晝夜精勤求之。 佛恐不得解脫。 欲謝其千輪之福。 乃為一正富羅。 富羅矩靴輪王業謝也)桑穀匪殷宗之禍(殷太戊以伊尹子伊陟為相。 桑穀共生于朝一且大拱懼而修德。 桑穀死三年。 重譯而至者十六國。 乃稱中宗)熒惑退宋都之災(火星見宋之分野。

yet their honor and lowliness differed. (Chapping means skin cracking. There was someone who sold medicine to treat it, but his earnings were very meager. A southern traveler bought his formula, went back, and presented it to his ruler; when it was used during a winter military campaign, he received great emoluments. This comes from Zhuangzi.) Stripping the feudatories of their land was the same, yet their rise and fall differed. (The First Emperor of Qin stripped and confiscated the lands of the feudal lords without enfeoffing them; when the Han army entered Qin, no one came to their rescue, and they perished. When Li Yiji had an audience with the King of Han, he urged him to enfeoff the feudal territories; when Zhang Liang arrived, he hastily halted it, borrowing eating sticks within the tent to calculate and argue why it should not be done, and so they did not enfeoff them; Han indeed flourished.) Truly, this is because circumstantial fortune has skill and clumsiness, and endowed destiny has what can be changed and what cannot be changed. Therefore, the gentleman, knowing that circumstantial fortune and destiny cannot be altered, delights in Heaven and knows destiny; the petty man, not knowing this, exceeds his bounds and acts rashly. (Not knowing the Dao, one cannot be a gentleman.) Thus, fortune and misfortune, safety and peril, are naturally visible. Those who claim that good and bad fortune are a constant principle that depends on destiny and not on circumstantial fortune are insufficient to make judgments. (Circumstantial fortune has obstruction and prosperity, good and bad fortune, which involve human agency.) For when winter grass is covered and does not die, how is that not due to circumstantial fortune? (Through circumstance and application, one may escape.) Those who claim that an endowed nature's capacity leads to destiny's fulfillment entirely through circumstantial fortune and not destiny are also insufficient to make judgments. (One who simply relies on circumstance and application without believing in past karma is also mistaken.) For when a cold tree is irrigated but does not flourish (To flourish is to be moist and watered. For example, if you water an ancient cypress, how could it suddenly grow luxuriant? It is because its constitution is firm), how is that not due to destiny? Only when both beliefs are complete may one be called a person who has attained the profound. Therefore, believing that there is circumstantial fortune is believing in karma; believing that there is destiny is believing in retribution. (Circumstantial fortune is karmic causes; destiny is karmic effects.) Believing in circumstantial fortune and destiny without believing in karmic cause and retribution—how is that different from being angry upon hearing "three in the morning and four in the evening," yet delighted upon hearing "four in the morning and three in the evening"? (Zhuangzi says: When it was said to give "three in the morning and four in the evening," all the monkeys were angry; but when it was said to give "four in the morning and three in the evening," the monkeys were all delighted, not realizing that the names were different while the reality was the same.) Thus, although the ancient sage Ruists of this land did not openly speak of karmic retribution, they secretly determined it by means of circumstantial fortune and destiny. (Determined means fixed. This is because they covertly fixed the principle of karma through circumstantial fortune and destiny.) The names are different, but the meaning is one and the same. The Changes says: "To know the incipient triggers—is that not divine?" Master Zhuang says: "The ten thousand things emerge from incipient triggers." The Yin Fu Jing says: "The mind is born from incipient triggers and dies from incipient triggers." (The original has: seeing things, incipient triggers arise. The mind can initiate incipient triggers, and the eyes can see incipient triggers. The mind of birth and death resides in things; the incipient triggers of success and failure are seen by the eyes. Zhang Zhan says: "The incipient trigger is the beginning of all beings and the highest point of movement.") An incipient trigger is the subtlety of movement; this indeed refers to karmic fortune. Someone may ask: Since karma arises from movement, its principle of retribution is uniform—how then can there be light and heavy, fixed and unfixed? (The karma generated is the same; how can there be lightness, heaviness, and unfixed receipt of retribution?) I reply: The mind has joy and anger; actions have kindness and cruelty. (The minds that generate actions differ.) Hence, bodily form cannot bear distress on the face, yet in the mind one indulges in the punishment of burning pillars. (King Zhou's lack of Dao: he altered the punishment of burning pillars and practiced the cruelty of disemboweling and hacking people to pieces. This is heavy karma.) Moreover, the Book of Documents says: "Pardon offenses, no matter how great; punish deliberate crimes, no matter how small." (Pardon means release. It means not refusing to pardon simply because an offense is great, and not failing to execute simply because a fault is small.) A sūtra says: "If shaped into an iron ball, even a small piece will sink in water; if shaped into an iron bowl, even a large piece will float." Are they not all due to this? (Even if karma is heavy, through fierce repentance one may escape; even if karma is light, if one does not repent, one must suffer it.) Furthermore, if we combine and separate the three karmas and the three periods of time to make eight (A single one of body, speech, or mind is called separate; the three karmas occurring together is called combined. The two modes of separate and combined encompass the three karmas and the three periods of time to make eight; the three periods are the three lifetimes), then when combined they are heavy, and when disparate they are light. (When the three karmas arise together, it is called heavy; when they do not arise together, it is called light.) When light, it is unfixed; only when heavy is it fixed. For this reason, Bimbisāra starved because of a rebellious son (Bimbisāra is King Bimbisāra); the Śākya clan died at the hands of a ferocious king (King Virūḍhaka); Yao possessed clarity and wisdom yet encountered the deluge (The great flood swelled and rose to mount the hills and overtop the mounds, and the common people were submerged); Tang had benevolent virtue yet met a severe drought (Tang held the world through benevolent virtue, yet there was a great drought for seven years, and he prayed at the Mulberry Forest); Zhang Yi and Shan Bao sought life through regimen, yet neither could live (Zhang Yi of Qi was a timid and cautious man. Whenever he saw a high gate hung with curtains, he never failed to run. At age forty, he died of an internal febrile illness. This was an excess of agitation clinging to the external. Shan Bao was a man of Lu who lived in a cave, drank spring water, and did not share in material profits with the people. At age seventy, he still had the complexion of an infant, but unfortunately met a hungry tiger that ate him. This was clinging to the internal. Shan Bao nourished his internal, but a tiger ate his external; Zhang Yi nourished his external, but illness attacked his internal. Both sought life, but neither could live); and Vakkula and Houji of Zhou did not seek life through regimen, yet both preserved their lives. This is because their circumstantial fortune and destiny were fixed. (Vakkula means "Good Appearance" in Chinese. Having once offered a single harītakī fruit, for ninety-one kalpas he never suffered from a headache. His stepmother devised means to kill him, but he survived five perils without dying. After leaving home, his eyes did not gaze at women, his body did not enter a nunnery, and he never spoke a single sentence of Dharma for a woman. King Aśoka, knowing of his few desires, offered a gold coin at his stūpa, but it sprang out of the earth and would not accept it. Houji of Zhou was the son of Emperor Di Ku, borne by Jiang Yuan. When born, he was covered in hair, and so he was abandoned in deep mountains, on cold ice, and in a narrow lane. Thrice abandoned and not dying, he was named Qi, meaning "The Abandoned." He was skilled in sowing seeds and served Yao; by his fifteenth-generation descendant King Wen, they won the empire.) The black wind blew, yet they obtained salvation (There was a merchant who entered the sea; when a black wind blew him into the land of the rākṣasas, they all recollected the Buddha and all obtained escape); the proper phulla was worn, and it long declined (There was a monk who, seeing the majestic power of a wheel-turning king, loved it and day and night strove diligently to seek it. The Buddha, fearing he would not attain liberation and wishing to diminish his merit of a thousand wheels, had him wear a single proper phulla; a phulla is a leather boot, and the wheel-turning king's karma was thereby diminished); the mulberry and paper mulberry did not spell calamity for the Yin ancestor (Taiwu of Yin made Yi Zhi, the son of Yi Yin, his minister. A mulberry and paper mulberry grew together in the court, and in a single morning they grew to a span; in fear, he cultivated virtue. The mulberry and paper mulberry died, and three years later, sixteen states arrived with multiple interpreters, so he was named Middle Ancestor); and Mars retreated, averting the disaster of the Song capital. (Mars appeared in the asterism assigned to Song.)

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

8.2.4

景公懼而修德。 火星乃退三舍也)文王錫武王三齡(齡壽也。 武王夢上帝之九齡文王賜之三齡故至九十三也)秦穆赦孟明再死。 蓋運命之不定也(秦將孟盟伐晉兩度。 過河不利。 秦穆赦之。 後焚舟而往晉不出。 乃雪前恥而歸)摭茲理例考之人事。 豈云無業哉(此皆業理分明之事)其有恃重玄者。 以為雁序。 羽羔跪乳。 烏黝鷴白。 棘尖𪙉方。 蘭馨蕕臭。 彼則自然之數也(此皆外道所計自然義故也)。 豈由業乎。 重空人撫衽告之曰。 不然也。 夫老聖云自然者其道也。 至道與萬物同體。 故曰萬物自然(萬物與至道不即離)即曰。 一陰一陽之謂道(道者寂然無體也。 神無方而易無體在陰以生在陽以成。 故曰一陰一陽之謂也)莊氏云。 在瓦礫在稊稗。 非謂萬物無因緣之義也(觸目皆道故也)夫稟性命者。 以業運為因緣(有情者。 皆憑宿業熏習為因緣也)處外物者。 以氣數為因緣(無情者。 憑根種為因。 陰陽氣數為緣也)故羔雁徵之於業習(雁序羔跪皆由業習也)𪙉棘求之於水土(假水土為增上緣也)烏反哺梟反噬。 蓋前生之行逆順之餘習也。 橘榮南而枳蕃北。 蓋隨風土之所變也(江南種之成橘。 江北種之成枳也)夫水潤下。 火炎上。 金從革。 木曲直。 土爰稼穡。 水䶢。 火苦。 金辛。 木酸。 土甘。 因五氣成五質。 播為五味。 凝為五色流五音。 然後錯而雜之。 剛柔強微。 所稟有異。 萬象生焉。 何異因緣之義乎(上皆洪範文義也)若又責以造化之本。 陰陽何施。 而孕育繁。 委使玄黃異視宮微分聽者。 則其酷矣(若一一窮究。 則其品類繁酷矣)夫萬物始於太極。 無因緣相構觸類成象不生而生(萬物本不生。 緣會而生)生於不生(道本無生。 萬物憑之而生)陰陽無心(造之非我。 理自玄應。 故曰無心)天地無功(老子云。 天地不仁。 以萬物為芻狗)聖人不宰(故云絕聖棄智大盜乃止擲玉毀珠小盜不起也)今古莫知夢幻之理。 於焉得矣。 故老氏云。 無名天地之始。 有名萬物之母(無名者。 妙道之本。 權輿天地也。 有名者。 滋生萬物。 故名曰母也)莊氏云。 大塊噫氣。 其名為風(文如海云。 大塊自然也。 噫吐氣貌也)由是。 象帝之先。 不可得而有始也。 若又責以外物觸氣流形。 內命亦何業之由者(外云如因無情擊觸。 內命而起愛憎。 豈是業耶)誠不足類也。 夫外物無心。 無心則業。 內命懷情。 懷情則業起。 故飄瓦之與投瓦。 俱及於人則有怒不怒也。 何斯之無別乎(劉子云。 飄瓦擊人。 虛舟觸己。 雖有忮心。 而不怒者。 以彼無情於擊鯛也)或曰。 善惡之業。 報施必臻。 故易曰。 積善之家。 必有餘慶。 積不善之家。 必有餘殃。 何瞽生舜。 舜生均。 鮌生禹耶(瞽之頑而生舜聖。 舜之聖而生均不肖。 鮌之兇而生禹聖。 此義何在)對曰。 聖人舉天理而立教。 語其多而不語其少也。 語其順而不語其違也(聖人舉慶善殃惡者。 乃天地常理也。 又言之則順不可言善招惡豈導物乎)故公劉洎王季克生聖嗣。 至于文王大造于周邦(周自后稷播種。 德及黎民。 公劉世守其官不窟迂西戎。 至季歷生聖子文王生武王。 而得天下三十七帝八百餘年。 皆積善流慶之道故也)弗父何洎正考父克邁仁德。 至仲尼光定文教(湯之後微子啟封宋。 至弗父何讓位厲公。 因賜孔姓。 至正考父三命益恭世修仁德。 至孔子蘊聖多能光顯文教者也)是以考歷象授人時者貞其所次式恒其紀(貞正式用也。 歷象日月五星為七政也)其或俶擾錯亂變化為凶。 祉誠則災異也。 若又或以聲不代響。 形不貿影(貿易也。 形不能代易於影)安有祖考施而子孫當其報者(自作自受。 各不相均)則義可得詳焉。 夫善惡以類相資而不相代。

[Duke Jing took fright and cultivated virtue, and Mars accordingly retrograded three lodges;) King Wen granted King Wu three years of life (a year meaning a year of age; King Wu dreamed of the Sovereign on High granting him nine years, and King Wen bestowed on him three of those years, so that he reached ninety-three); Duke Mu of Qin twice pardoned Mengming from death: these show the indeterminacy of fortune and lifespan (the Qin general Mengming attacked Jin twice and met with misfortune upon crossing the river; Duke Mu of Qin pardoned him, and later he burned his boats and marched against Jin, who did not dare emerge; thus he wiped away his former shame and returned). If one takes these principles and examples to examine human affairs, how could one say there is no karma? (These are all matters in which the principle of karma is manifest.) There are those who rely on Double Mystery and take the flight of geese in order, the suckling lamb kneeling, the crow being black and the silver pheasant white, thorns being sharp and the water-chestnut squarish, the orchid fragrant and the marsh-cabbage foul, to be numbers of nature (these are all the positions of external traditions regarding the meaning of nature); how could they derive from karma? A man of twofold emptiness smoothed his lapels and informed them, saying: "It is not so. What the ancient sage [Laozi] calls 'nature' is the Dao. The ultimate Dao is of the same substance with the myriad things; hence he says, 'The myriad things are naturally so' (the myriad things are neither identical with nor separate from the ultimate Dao). He also says: 'One yin and one yang: this is called the Dao' (the Dao is quiescent and without substance; the spiritual has no direction and the *Changes* has no substance; it brings about birth through yin and accomplishes completion through yang, so it is said: 'One yin and one yang is what it is called'). Master Zhuang says: '[The Dao] is in broken tiles, in weeds and tare,' which does not mean that the myriad things lack the principle of causes and conditions (it is because whatever strikes the eye is all the Dao). Those endowed with nature and lifespan take karma and fortune as their causes and conditions (sentient beings all rely on the habituation of past karma as their causes and conditions); what pertains to external things takes qi and numbers as its causes and conditions (insentient things rely on roots and seeds as their cause, and the qi and numbers of yin and yang as their condition). Therefore, the lamb and wild goose are verified by karmic habituation (the goose flock's order and the lamb's kneeling all stem from karmic habituation); the water-chestnut and thorn are sought in water and earth (they avail themselves of water and earth as sovereign conditions). That the crow regurgitates food to its mother and the owl devours its mother is the residual habituation of filial and unfilial conduct in former lives. That the sweet mandarin flourishes in the south while the bitter trifoliate orange thrives in the north is due to changes according to climate and soil (planted south of the Jiang it becomes an orange; planted north of the Jiang it becomes a trifoliate orange). Water moistens downward; fire flames upward; metal conforms and changes; wood bends and straightens; earth receives sowing and reaping. Water is salty; fire is bitter; metal is pungent; wood is sour; earth is sweet. Through the five qi the five substances are formed; they disperse into the five flavors, congeal into the five colors, and flow forth as the five tones. Thereafter they intermingle and blend, becoming hard or soft, strong or faint; what they receive is distinct, and the myriad phenomena arise from this. How does this differ from the meaning of causes and conditions? (The above are all the textual meanings of the 'Great Plan'.) If one further questions the origin of the creation and transformation—how yin and yang are deployed so that breeding and nurturing become so manifold, assigning dark-yellow for different sight and palace-minor tones for distinct hearing—then that would be excessive (if one scrutinizes them one by one, their categories are excessively numerous). The myriad things begin in the Great Ultimate (Taiji); without causes and conditions compounding one another and striking their kinds to form phenomena, they are born without being born (the myriad things fundamentally are unborn; they are born through the conjunction of conditions); they are born from the unborn (the Dao fundamentally has no birth; the myriad things rely on it to be born). Yin and yang have no mind (creating them does not depend on a self; the principle mysteriously responds of itself, so it is called 'without mind'). Heaven and Earth have no merit (Laozi says: 'Heaven and Earth are not benevolent; they treat the myriad things as straw dogs'). The Sage does not rule (hence it is said: 'Abandon sageliness and discard wisdom, and great thieves will cease; cast away jade and shatter pearls, and petty thieves will not arise'). Through past and present, no one understands the principle of dreams and illusions; herein it is attained. Thus Old Master [Laozi] says: 'The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth; the named is the mother of the myriad things' (the nameless is the root of the wondrous Dao, the origin of Heaven and Earth; the named nurtures the myriad things, hence it is called 'mother'). Master Zhuang says: 'The Great Clod puffs out breath, and its name is wind' (Wen Ruhai says: 'The Great Clod is nature; puffing out breath is the appearance of exhaling qi'). Hence, prior to the Sovereign of Forms, it cannot be conceived as having a beginning. If one further objects that since external things are stimulated by qi to stream into form, on what karma could inner lifespan depend? (The outsider says: if, due to insentient things colliding and striking, the inner lifespan gives rise to love and hate, how could that be karma?) this truly cannot be analogized. External things have no mind; without mind, where would karma be? Inner lifespan harbors feeling; harboring feeling, karma arises. Thus, between a blown tile and a thrown tile, when both hit a person, there is wrath in one case and not in the other. How could there be no distinction in this? (Liu Ling says: 'When a blown tile strikes a person or an empty boat bumps into oneself, even if one has an irritable mind, one does not get angry, because the other has no intention in the striking.') Someone may ask: 'Retribution for good and bad karma must inevitably arrive. Thus the *Changes* says: "A family that accumulates good will surely have an excess of blessings; a family that accumulates evil will surely have an excess of calamities." Why then did Gu-sou father Shun, Shun father Shangjun, and Gun father Yu?' (The stubborn Gu-sou fathered the sage Shun; the sage Shun fathered the unworthy Shangjun; the wicked Gun fathered the sage Yu: what is the meaning of this?) I reply: 'The Sages established their teachings by pointing to heavenly principle, speaking of what is frequent rather than what is rare, and speaking of what is compliant rather than what is contrary (when the Sages point to blessings for the good and calamities for the evil, this is the constant principle of Heaven and Earth; moreover, to speak of it this way complies with nature, for one cannot say that goodness invites evil, as how would that guide living beings?). Thus Duke Liu and King Ji were able to give birth to sage heirs, down to King Wen who made great achievements for the realm of Zhou (from Houji sowing crops, his virtue reached the common people; Duke Liu successively maintained his official duties and did not bend to the Western Rong; down to Jili giving birth to the sage son King Wen, and King Wen giving birth to King Wu, who gained the realm for thirty-seven emperors over eight hundred years, all because of the way accumulating goodness pours out blessings). Fufu He and Zheng Kaofu were able to advance in benevolence and virtue, down to Zhongni [Confucius] who gloriously established the cultural teachings (after Tang, Weizi Qi was enfeoffed in Song; down to Fufu He yielding the throne to Duke Li, he was accordingly granted the surname Kong; down to Zheng Kaofu, who was all the more deferential upon each of three appointments, his house cultivated benevolence and virtue for generations, down to Confucius who encompassed sageliness and multifaceted ability, gloriously displaying the cultural teachings). Therefore, those who examine celestial phenomena to impart the seasons to the people determine their stations and regularize their periods (to determine is to make upright and apply; celestial phenomena refer to the sun, moon, and five planets as the Seven Governings); if they are occasionally agitated, disordered, and change into baleful omens, these are truly anomalies and calamities. If someone further holds that just as a sound cannot substitute for its echo, and a form cannot exchange places with its shadow (to exchange is to trade; a form cannot exchange places with its shadow), how could an ancestor act and his descendants receive the retribution? (Each creates and each receives; they are not shared equally)—then the principle may be explained in detail. Good and evil assist one another according to their kinds, but do not substitute for one another."}

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

8.2.5

故先人以福施。 後世以福繼之。 非無福者而為其子孫矣。 先人以禍施。 後世以禍繼之。 非無禍者而為其子孫矣。 故龍與雲合。 虎與風合(龍吟則雲起。 虎嘯則風生)銅山崩而景鍾震(漢殿鍾震。 蜀銅山崩。 似類相應也)葭灰消而月暈缺(淮南子云。 隨灰而月暈缺。 注云。 以取蘆灰環月缺其一面。 則月暈亦闕)蓋應會之數矣(以類相感故也)。 常俚以殘淫𭤑寇。 傷生破產。 方謂身之罪也(常俚鄙俗也。 𭤑寇盜劫也。 則淫盜殺皆身業行也)訾言勃詐。 凌犯君親。 方謂口之罪也(語集也)機慮無法。 潛毒懷虐。 方謂心之罪也(意業也)曾不知有百行乖儀。 五常失守。 處俗於忠孝不至。 出家於慈悲不厚。 釁生於微。 積而成形。 則為罪矣(水滴雖微漸盈大器)常俚以徇物捐軀。 蹲膜擎跽(蹲膜禮拜擎合掌跪胡坐也)方謂身之福也。 誦言講法。 悅人進己。 方謂口之福也。 愛惡絕向。 忌剋不入。 方謂心之福也。 曾不知手足之所措。 詞論之所及。 念慮之所經。 興意介益。 孚于惠心。 省罪引慝(所謂懺悔也)則謂福矣。 故五穀不易。 其種百行。 不反其報。 仲尼莊生云夷齊仁而餓死(伯夷叔齊。 遼東孤竹君之二子。 父死讓位歸周。 聞武王伐紂。 叩馬首而諫不從。 乃隱首山之陽。 不食周粟以至餓卒也)尾生信而溺死(尾生與女子約于橋下。 未至而水爆漲生。 恐失信不移而至溺死也)伍胥忠而伏劍死(伍員字子胥相吳諫夫差不納西施王不聽。 乃伏劍死。 越音收吳也)以為外事無必(必專也定也)斯實滯名害德。 失乎中庸之道。 非謂以善召禍也。 昔大士坐道樹戰天魔。 業之然也(如來於菩提樹下成道破四魔所謂天魔蘊魔煩惱魔死魔)處巖穴灑足血。 業之然也。 造濱州食馬麥。 業之然也。 故語今報則善酬往業豈滅。 禮曰。 子夏喪其子而喪其明(自睛也)曾子弔之曰。 吾聞朋友喪其明則哭之。 曾子哭。 子夏亦哭曰。 天乎余之無罪曾子怒曰。 商爾何為無罪也(商子夏名)吾與爾事夫子於洙泗之間。 退而老於西河之上(華陰之地也)使西河之人疑爾為夫子。 爾罪一也。 喪爾親使民未有聞。 爾罪二也。 喪爾子喪爾明。 爾罪三也(一不稱師。 二於親恩薄。 三於子厚是罪也)而曰何自謂無罪歟。 夫如曾氏始謂見天地之心。 知禍福之萌矣。 石駘仲卒(衛太夫石碏之後)無嫡子有庶子六人。 卜所以為後者(吉者從之)沐浴佩王則兆(齊潔求吉兆也)五人沐浴佩玉。 石祁子曰。 孰有執親之喪。 而沐浴佩玉者乎。 不沐浴佩玉(心王且知禮)石祁子兆衛人。 以龜為有知也。 是知業理冥奧。 儒辨此世。 釋通三世。 一張一弛範圍天下備矣。 而經亦云誤殺誤報。 甞有山間比丘。 誤蹈一蟻。 蟻死為野豕觸石而崩。 比丘亦誤死於是也。 而世有色雖仁而行違。 言雖澤而心詖(詖險也。 所謂色厲而內荏言偽而辯也)衒聲名冐祿利。 知善且蔽。 忌惡而黨。 捨人急己。 輔高弱下。 力行僭賢。 畏罪矯容。 滅裂行其事。 恢張希其報。 都不見其功過相磨恩害相補。 上智審諸己。 中智求諸人。 下智昏昏然。 皆謂其損益自然也。 夫李廣不封侯(李廣。 隴西人。 號漢飛將軍。 善射手不虛發。 甞射石虎。 應絃沒羽。 戰蕃殺戮至甚。 以此竟不封侯)白起死杜卸(白起。 秦將。 善野戰坑。 趙降卒四十萬。 竟死於杜卸驛也)虞詡相朝歌(漢虞經善斷獄。 詡即其後也。 詡奏帝以雍州三郡為屯田省也。 竟不得其死)雖保節忠主。 而皆要功害物。 故將死之日方始省其前過者也。

Therefore, ancestors act with blessings, and subsequent generations carry them on with blessings; none who lack blessings become their descendants. Ancestors act with calamity, and subsequent generations carry them on with calamity; none who lack calamity become their descendants. Thus dragons unite with clouds, and tigers unite with winds (when dragons croon, clouds arise; when tigers roar, winds are born). When the copper mountain collapsed, the palace bell reverberated (when the bell in the Han palace reverberated, it was because a copper mountain in Shu had collapsed; things of like kind respond to one another). When reed ash was dissipated, the lunar halo showed a gap (The Huainanzi says, “Following the ash, the lunar halo has a gap.” The commentary says, “Taking reed ash and making a ring representing the moon with one side missing, the halo of the moon will also be deficient”). These are indeed the principles of corresponding resonance (because like kinds stimulate each other). Common folk consider cruel lust, plunder, harm to life, and ruining households to be the only sins of the body (common folk are the vulgar populace; plunder means theft and robbery; thus lust, theft, and killing are all bodily karmic actions). They consider slanderous speech, deceitful outbursts, and transgressing against rulers and parents to be the only sins of the mouth (a collection of speech). They consider unscrupulous stratagems and harboring concealed malice and cruelty to be the only sins of the mind (mental karma). Little do they know that if one's myriad deeds contravene propriety and the Five Constants are neglected, if living in the secular world one falls short in loyalty and filial piety, or if having left home one is not profound in compassion—when offenses arise from the minute and accumulate to take form, they become sins (though water droplets are minute, they gradually fill a large vessel). Common folk consider sacrificing oneself for things and kneeling, prostrating, and clasping the hands (kneeling and prostrating mean worship; clasping refers to joining palms, and kneeling means sitting on the heels) to be the only blessings of the body. They consider reciting words, preaching the Dharma, pleasing others, and advancing oneself to be the only blessings of the mouth. They consider ending bias between love and hate and letting no envy or malice enter to be the only blessings of the mind. Little do they know that wherever hands and feet are placed, wherever words and discourse reach, and wherever thoughts traverse—arousing the intention to bring slight benefit, being sincere in a benevolent heart, and reflecting on guilt to confess faults (what is called repentance)—these are truly termed blessings. Thus the five grains do not alter their seed; the myriad actions do not fail their retribution. Confucius and Zhuangzi said that Boyi and Shuqi were benevolent yet died of starvation (Boyi and Shuqi were two sons of the Lord of Guzhu in Liaodong. Upon their father's death, they yielded the position and submitted to the Zhou. Hearing that King Wu was punishing Zhou, they clasped the reins of his horse and remonstrated, but were not heeded. Thereupon they secluded themselves on the southern slopes of Mount Shouyang, and refused to eat the grain of the Zhou until they starved to death); Weisheng was trustworthy yet drowned (Weisheng made a rendezvous with a woman under a bridge; she had not arrived when the water suddenly swelled, and fearing to break his trust, he did not move and drowned); Wu Zixu was loyal yet died falling upon his sword (Wu Yuan, styled Zixu, served as chancellor of Wu and remonstrated with Fuchai not to accept Xishi; the king did not listen, so he fell upon his sword and died. Yue subsequently captured Wu); taking these as instances where external affairs are not certain (certain means definite and fixed). These, in truth, were instances of clinging to reputations and harming virtue, straying from the Middle Way; it is not that good deeds invited calamity. Anciently, when the Mahāsattva sat at the Bodhi tree and battled the heavenly demons, it was through karma that it was so (when the Tathāgata attained awakening under the Bodhi tree, he broke the four māras, namely: heavenly māra, skandha-māra, kleśa-māra, and mṛtyu-māra). When he dwelt in a rocky cave and shed blood from his foot, it was through karma that it was so. When he arrived in Bāraṇasī and ate horse barley, it was through karma that it was so. Therefore, speaking of current retribution, good recompense does not extinguish past karma. The Rites say that when Zixia lost his son, he lost his sight (his pupils). Zengzi condoled with him, saying, “I have heard that when a friend loses his sight, one should weep for him.” Zengzi wept, and Zixia wept also, saying, “O Heaven! I am without guilt!” Zengzi said angrily, “Shang, why do you say you are without guilt? (Shang was Zixia's name.) You and I served the Master between the Zhu and Si rivers, and you retired to grow old upon the Xihe (the region of Huayin), causing the people of Xihe to suspect you were the Master: this is your first guilt. When you mourned your parents, the people heard nothing of it: this is your second guilt. When you mourned your son, you lost your sight: this is your third guilt (first, not matching the teacher; second, being slight in filial piety toward parents; third, being excessive toward one's son: these are guilts). How can you say of yourself that you are without guilt?” Only with one like Zengzi can one be said to perceive the mind of Heaven and Earth and know the sprouts of calamity and fortune. When Shi Daizhong died (a descendant of Grand Master Shi Que of Wei), he had no legitimate son but had six sons by concubines. They divined to determine who should be the heir (they would follow the auspicious one), saying that he who bathed and wore jade would receive the omen (cleansing and purifying to seek an auspicious omen). Five of them bathed and wore jade. Shi Qizi said, “Who, when observing mourning for a parent, would bathe and wear jade?” He did not bathe or wear jade (his mind held jade and moreover knew propriety). The omen fell upon Shi Qizi; the people of Wei regarded the tortoise as having awareness. From this we know that the principle of karma is profound and obscure: the Ruists discern this world, while the Buddhists penetrate the three times; the alternation of tension and relaxation comprehensively encompasses the realm under Heaven. Moreover, the scriptures also state that accidental killing brings accidental retribution. Once there was a mountain monk who accidentally stepped on an ant; the ant died, and later, when a wild boar struck a boulder causing it to collapse, the monk also met an accidental death there. Yet in the world, there are those whose outward countenance seems benevolent while their actions run contrary; whose words seem gracious while their minds are treacherous (treacherous means dangerous; what is called “stern of countenance but weak within,” and “deceitful of speech yet eloquent”). Flaunting reputation and coveting emoluments and gain, when they know the good they obscure it, and envious of evil they form factions; they neglect others and hurry for themselves, supporting the exalted and weakening the lowly, striving to usurp the worthy; fearing guilt, they dissemble their appearance, carrying out their affairs carelessly, yet broadly expecting great rewards. They do not at all see that their merits and faults grind against each other and that kindness and harm compensate one another. Superior wisdom examines this in oneself; mediocre wisdom seeks it in others; inferior wisdom is muddled and dark, all saying that loss and gain are merely natural. Now, Li Guang was never enfiefed as a marquis (Li Guang was a native of Longxi, known as the Flying General of the Han. He was an expert archer whose hands never missed their mark; once he shot a stone tiger, burying the fletching at the twang of his bowstring. In battling the barbarians his slaughter was extreme, and because of this he ultimately was never enfiefed as a marquis); Bai Qi died at Duyou (Bai Qi was a general of Qin, skilled in field warfare; he buried alive four hundred thousand surrendered troops of Zhao, and ultimately died at Duyou Post); Yu Xu was chancellor of Chaoge (in the Han, Yu Jing was skilled in deciding judicial cases; Xu was his descendant. Xu memorialized the emperor to establish military colonies in the three commanderies of Yongzhou to economize; ultimately he did not die a natural death). Although they preserved integrity and were loyal to their rulers, they all sought glory while harming living beings. Hence, only on the day of their approaching death did they begin to reflect upon their past faults.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)