<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.28 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [三教平心論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117) › 2.28

# 三教平心論 2.28

三教平心論 2.28

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.28)

明道曰。佛老其言近理。又非楊墨之比所以為禍害甚於楊墨之害。抑不思。萬形皆有弊惟理獨不朽。既曰近理。而復謂其為害。可乎。

> Mingdao said: "The words of the Buddha and Laozi approach principle, and are not to be compared to Yang \[Zhu\] and Mo \[Di\]; therefore, the disaster and harm they cause are worse than the harm of Yang and Mo." But does he not consider: All ten thousand forms suffer decay; principle alone is imperishable. Having already said that they approach principle, to claim again that they cause harm—can that be right?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.27)
- [Next: 2.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.29)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117~en-mt.2.28) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2117.2.28) · Pramāṇa
