[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [折疑論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118) › 2.47 # 折疑論 2.47 折疑論 2.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2.47) 所明既博文奚為繁（結前萬計億數之言。佛既明廣大無窮之事。其經文又何為繁也哉）。 > Since what is clarified is so extensive, why should the texts be considered redundant? (Concluding the earlier statement about 'tens of thousands and hundreds of millions': since the Buddha clarifies inexhaustible and vast matters, why should his scriptural texts be considered redundant?) > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2.46) - [Next: 2.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2.48) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118~en-mt.2.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2118.2.47) · Pramāṇa