[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法苑珠林](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122) › 72.55 # 法苑珠林 72.55 法苑珠林 72.55 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [72.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72.55) 第五明見取者。此還有二。一是獨頭。二是足上。言獨頭者。謂直取世間有漏善法及有漏果。以為第一勝妙善者。名為獨頭。如人直取無想天報。計為涅槃。謂第一好。又於內身不淨謂淨。如是皆名獨頭見取。言足上者。謂人迷法妄立是非。謂己見是。餘者非。便即生心。於己見上執為第一。是故名為足上見取。如起身見是其我倒。愚人不解後更起心。取前身見以為第一。如此見取名為足上。餘義同前釋。此既同前有何差別。若執有漏世間事業。取以為道。即名戒取。若執為勝。即名見取。故俱舍論云。一切有流法。聖人所棄捨。故執此法為最勝。是名見取。又成論云。若人持戒最為清淨。名戒取結。即謂所取。以為真實。餘皆妄語。名見取結。若謂世法第一。皆同愚人。取見為勝。是以齊名見取煩惱也。 > Fifth, explaining attachment to views (dṛṣṭiparāmarśa): here again there are two kinds: the first is solitary, and the second is based upon a foot. The solitary refers to directly grasping worldly conditioned wholesome dharmas and conditioned fruits, taking them to be the supreme, most wonderful goodness; this is called solitary. Just as someone directly grasps the retribution of the heaven without conceptualization and reckons it to be nirvāṇa, calling it the most excellent; or regarding the internal body, taking the impure to be pure—all such are called solitary attachment to views. 'Based upon a foot' refers to a person who is deluded about dharmas and falsely establishes right and wrong, saying his own view is right and others' are wrong; he immediately generates a mind that clings to his own view as supreme; therefore it is named attachment to views based upon a foot. For example, giving rise to the view of individuality is the inversion of self; a foolish person does not understand, and later gives rise to a mind again, grasping the prior view of individuality as supreme. Such attachment to views is called 'based upon a foot'. The remaining meaning is the same as the previous explanation. Since this is the same as the previous, what is the difference? If one clings to conditioned worldly activities and grasps them as the path, that is called attachment to precepts and vows; if one clings to them as supreme, that is called attachment to views. Thus the Abhidharmakośa-śāstra says: 'All conditioned dharmas are discarded by noble ones; therefore, clinging to these dharmas as supreme is called attachment to views.' Moreover, the Satyasiddhi-śāstra says: 'If a person holds that precepts are the most pure, it is called the fetter of attachment to precepts and vows; then to claim that what he has grasped is true and all else is false is called the fetter of attachment to views.' If one says that worldly dharmas are supreme, all are identical to foolish persons grasping views as supreme; on this account, they are equally termed the affliction of attachment to views. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 72.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72.54) - [Next: 72.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72.56) - [Up: 72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122~en-mt.72.55) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.72.55) · Pramāṇa