[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [翻譯名義集](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131) › 1.58 # 翻譯名義集 1.58 翻譯名義集 1.58 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1.58) 【毘盧遮那】《輔行》曰：「此云遍一切處。煩惱體淨，眾德悉備，身土相稱，遍一切處。」《唯識論》云：「一自性身，謂諸如來，真淨法界，受用變化，平等所依，離相寂然，絕諸戲論，具無邊際真實功德，是一切法平等實性，即此自性，亦名法身。」《光明玄》云：「法名可軌，諸佛軌之而得成佛。故經言諸佛所師，所謂法也。」《摩訶衍論》云：「剋其法身，真實自體，湛湛絕慮，寂寂名斷，能為色相作所依止。今問：『寂寂名斷，安名法身？』答：『法實無名，為機詮辯，召寂寂體，強稱法身。』問：『湛湛之體，當同太虛？』答：『凡所有相，皆是非相。覺五音如谷響，知實無聲，了萬物如夢形，見皆非色。空有不二，中道昭然，不可聞無，謂空斷絕。』」 > \[Vairocana\]: The Fuxing says: "Here translated as Pervading All Places (Bian Yiqie Chu). The substance of the afflictions is pure, the myriad virtues are fully provided, body and land match each other, and he pervades all places." The Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi says: "First is the svabhāvakāya, referring to the pure, true dharmadhātu of all Tathāgatas, which is the equal basis of enjoyment and transformation, quiescent and free from marks, cutting off all conceptual proliferation, and possessing boundless true virtues; it is the equal real nature of all phenomena. This very self-nature is also called the dharmakāya." The Xuan of the Golden Light Sūtra says: "Dharma means that which can serve as a model; all Buddhas model themselves on it and attain buddhahood. Therefore the sūtra says: 'That which all Buddhas take as their teacher is what is called the Dharma.'" The Mahāyāna Treatise says: "Examining its dharmakāya, its real substance is profoundly tranquil beyond discursive thoughts; being quiescent, it is named extinction, and is able to serve as the support for physical forms. Now we ask: 'If being quiescent is named extinction, how can it be called the dharmakāya?' Answer: 'The Dharma is in truth without names; to expound and differentiate it for the sake of capacities, we designate the quiescent substance and arbitrarily term it the dharmakāya.' Question: 'Should the tranquil substance be the same as empty space?' Answer: 'All marks whatsoever are non-marks. One recognizes the five musical sounds to be like echoes in a valley, knowing that they have no real sound; one understands the myriad things to be like forms in a dream, seeing that all are non-matter. Emptiness and existence are non-dual, and the Middle Way is luminous; one must not, upon hearing of non-existence, consider emptiness to be total annihilation.'" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1.57) - [Next: 1.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1.59) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131~en-mt.1.58) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2131.1.58) · Pramāṇa