<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.4 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [開元釋教錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154) › 10.4.4

# 開元釋教錄 10.4.4

開元釋教錄 10.4.4

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [10.4.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.4)

六卷。總錄第七。合為七卷（撰錄者曰。余檢尋此錄。非無差  
錯。即如曇摩羅剎晉言法護。總是一人。錄中分二。云各出須真天子經二卷。編為重譯。不識梵晉之言。一誤也。如  
律二十二明了論。總是一經錄中分為二部。律二十二卷編在律中。明了論一卷在於是論錄。一經之題分二上  
錄。二誤也。其律二十二乃是明了論半題。今云二十二卷誤之甚也。真諦攝論十二卷與十五卷者。二本不殊存  
其二部而言重譯。三誤也。以仁王經起信論等編在疑錄。四誤也。不能備陳。略述如此）。  
隋開皇三寶錄一十五卷（內題云歷代三寶記開皇十七年興善寺翻經學  
士成都費長房撰）  
歷代三寶紀第一（帝年上周秦）  
從周莊王他十年甲午。至秦始皇帝子子  
嬰甲午年凡二十六主四百八十一載。  
歷代三寶紀第二（帝年次前漢新王後漢）  
從前漢高帝元年乙未。至後漢獻帝建安  
二十四年己亥。凡二十六君四百二十五  
載。  
歷代三寶紀第三（帝年下魏晉宋齊梁周隋）  
從魏文帝黃初元年庚子。至隋開皇十七  
年丁巳。凡四十四主三百七十八載。  
歷代三寶紀第四（譯經後漢）  
右從明帝永平十年丁卯。至獻帝末年歷  
一十一主一百五十二年。華戎道俗十有  
二人。并古失譯合出經律三百三十四部  
四百一十六卷。  
歷代三寶紀第五（譯經魏漢）  
右魏吳兩代。道俗十人。所出經律羯磨并  
舊失譯。合三百一十二部四百八十二卷。  
歷代三寶紀第六（譯經西晉）  
右西晉代。華戎道俗十有三人。并前失譯  
諸經戒等。合四百五十一部七百一十七  
卷。  
歷代三寶紀第七（譯經東晉）  
右東晉代。華戎道俗二十七人。而所出經  
并舊失譯。合二百六十三部五百八十五  
卷。  
歷代三寶紀第八（譯經符秦姚秦）  
右二秦之代。華戎釋種一十六人。合出經  
論傳等一百六十四部九百四卷。  
歷代三寶紀第九（譯經西秦北涼元魏高齊陳氏）  
右五代。緇素共二十七人。所出三藏及記  
錄等并及失譯。合二百三部八百五十五  
卷。  
歷代三寶紀第十（譯經宋）  
右宋代。華戎道俗二十三人。出經律論及  
傳錄等。凡二百一十部四百九十卷。  
歷代三寶紀第十一（譯經齊梁周）  
右三代。緇素共五十一人。出經律論及傳  
錄等。一百六十二部一千三百二十六卷。  
歷代三寶紀第十二（譯經大隋）  
右隋代。華戎緇素十有九人。所翻新文及  
雜舊本論傳法式。合七十五部四百六十  
二卷。  
歷代三寶紀第十三（大乘錄入藏目五百五十一部一千五百八十六卷）  
大乘修多羅有譯一（三百三十四部八百八十五卷）  
修多羅失譯二（三百三十五部四百二卷）  
毘尼有譯三（一十九部四十卷）  
毘尼失譯四（一十二部一十四卷）  
阿毘曇有譯五（四十九部二百三十八卷）  
阿毘曇失譯六（二部七卷）  
歷代三寶紀第十四（小乘錄入藏目五百二十五部一千七百三十九卷錄云七百一十  
二卷者誤）  
小乘修多羅有譯一（一百八部五百二十七卷）  
修多羅失譯二（三百一十六部四百八十二卷）  
毘尼有譯三（三十九部一百八十五卷）  
毘尼失譯四（三十一部六十七卷）  
阿毘曇有譯五（二十一部三百五十一卷）  
阿毘曇失譯六（一十部二十七卷）  
開皇三寶錄總目一卷（內典錄云房錄所出經律論傳總二千一百四十六部六  
千二百三十五卷非入藏數算得七十四部三十七卷與內典不同）  
右兼總目共成一十五卷（其第十三十四大小乘入藏目錄合一千七十  
六部二千三百二十五卷房錄本數三千三百九十二卷者計數錯也）內典錄云。房  
所撰者。入藏之中瓦玉相謬。得在繁富未  
可覈通。非無憑准未可偏削（撰錄者曰。余檢長房入藏錄中事實  
雜謬。其闕本疑偽皆編入藏。竊為不可。又如大乘錄中賢劫經賢劫三昧經。此是一經兩名。今存二部。一誤。須  
菩提品及長安品此並般若鈔之異名。今別存兩部。二誤。須真天子經須真天子問四事經亦一經兩名。重載二

> \[Fascicle\] 6. The General Catalogue is the seventh, bringing the total to seven fascicles. (The compiler notes: Upon examining this catalogue, I find it is not without errors. For instance, Dharmarakṣa—in the Jin language, Fahu—is completely the same person, yet the catalogue divides him into two, claiming each produced a two-fascicle \*Sujintianzi jing\* and cataloguing them as re-translations. Failing to recognise Sanskrit and Jin words is the first error. For another example, the \*Lü ershi'er mingliao lun\* is entirely a single text, yet the catalogue splits it into two works: twenty-two fascicles of the \*Vinaya\* are catalogued under vinaya, while a one-fascicle \*Mingliao lun\* is placed under the catalogue of śāstras. Splitting the title of a single text into two entries in the catalogue is the second error. That 'twenty-two of the vinaya' is simply half of the title \*Mingliao lun\*; saying now that it is 'twenty-two fascicles' is an extreme error. Paramārtha's \*Mahāyānasaṃgraha\* in twelve fascicles and the one in fifteen fascicles are not different texts, yet he keeps them as two works and calls them re-translations, which is the third error. Cataloguing the \*Renwang jing\*, the \*Awakening of Faith\*, and so forth under the catalogue of doubtful texts is the fourth error. I cannot detail them all, but have briefly stated them as such.)  
> Sui dynasty: \*Kaihuang Sanbao lu\*, fifteen fascicles (its inner title is \*Lidai sanbao ji\*; compiled in the seventeenth year of Kaihuang by Fei Changfang of Chengdu, scholar at the translation bureau of Xingshan Temple).  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 1 (Chronology of Emperors, part 1: Zhou and Qin).  
> From the tenth year (\*jiawu\*) of King Zhuang of Zhou to the \*jiawu\* year of Ziying, son of the First Emperor of Qin, there were twenty-six rulers and 481 years in all.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 2 (Chronology of Emperors, part 2: Former Han, Xin-Wang, and Later Han).  
> From the first year (\*yiwei\*) of Emperor Gao of the Former Han to the twenty-fourth year (\*yihai\*) of the Jian'an reign of Emperor Xian of the Later Han, there were twenty-six rulers and 425 years in all.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 3 (Chronology of Emperors, part 3: Wei, Jin, Song, Qi, Liang, Zhou, and Sui).  
> From the first year (\*gengzi\*) of the Huangchu reign of Emperor Wen of Wei to the seventeenth year (\*dingsi\*) of the Kaihuang reign of the Sui, there were forty-four rulers and 378 years in all.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 4 (Translated Sūtras: Later Han).  
> The above spans from the tenth year (\*dingmao\*) of the Yongping reign of Emperor Ming to the final year of Emperor Xian, through eleven rulers and 152 years. Twelve people—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with ancient anonymous translations, produced a total of 334 works in 416 fascicles of sūtras and vinaya.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 5 (Translated Sūtras: Wei and Wu).  
> The above covers the two dynasties of Wei and Wu. Ten individuals, clergy and laity, along with former anonymous translations, produced a total of 312 works in 482 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, and karmans.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 6 (Translated Sūtras: Western Jin).  
> The above covers the Western Jin dynasty. Thirteen individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with previous anonymous translations of various sūtras, precepts, and so on, produced a total of 451 works in 717 fascicles.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 7 (Translated Sūtras: Eastern Jin).  
> The above covers the Eastern Jin dynasty. Twenty-seven individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with old anonymous translations, produced a total of 263 works in 585 fascicles of translated sūtras.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 8 (Translated Sūtras: Fu Qin and Yao Qin).  
> The above covers the era of the two Qins. Sixteen individuals—Chinese and foreign of the Śākya clan—produced a total of 164 works in 904 fascicles of sūtras, śāstras, biographies, and so on.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 9 (Translated Sūtras: Western Qin, Northern Liang, Yuan Wei, Northern Qi, and Chen).  
> The above covers five dynasties. A total of twenty-seven people, clergy and laity, produced 203 works in 855 fascicles of the tripiṭaka, records, and so on, together with anonymous translations.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 10 (Translated Sūtras: Song).  
> The above covers the Song dynasty. Twenty-three individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—produced a total of 210 works in 490 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, biographies, catalogues, and so on.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 11 (Translated Sūtras: Qi, Liang, and Zhou).  
> The above covers three dynasties. A total of fifty-one people, clergy and laity, produced 162 works in 1,326 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, biographies, catalogues, and so on.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 12 (Translated Sūtras: Great Sui).  
> The above covers the Sui dynasty. Nineteen people—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—translated new texts and various old versions of śāstras, biographies, and ceremonial manuals, totalling 75 works in 462 fascicles.  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 13 (Mahāyāna Catalogue: texts admitted into the canon, 551 works in 1,586 fascicles).  
> Mahāyāna sūtras with known translators, 1 (334 works in 885 fascicles);  
> Sūtras with anonymous translators, 2 (335 works in 402 fascicles);  
> Vinaya with known translators, 3 (19 works in 40 fascicles);  
> Vinaya with anonymous translators, 4 (12 works in 14 fascicles);  
> Abhidharma with known translators, 5 (49 works in 238 fascicles);  
> Abhidharma with anonymous translators, 6 (2 works in 7 fascicles).  
> \*Lidai sanbao ji\*, fascicle 14 (Hīnayāna Catalogue: texts admitted into the canon, 525 works in 1,739 fascicles; the catalogue's statement of 712 fascicles is an error).  
> Hīnayāna sūtras with known translators, 1 (108 works in 527 fascicles);  
> Sūtras with anonymous translators, 2 (316 works in 482 fascicles);  
> Vinaya with known translators, 3 (39 works in 185 fascicles);  
> Vinaya with anonymous translators, 4 (31 works in 67 fascicles);  
> Abhidharma with known translators, 5 (21 works in 351 fascicles);  
> Abhidharma with anonymous translators, 6 (10 works in 27 fascicles).  
> \*Kaihuang Sanbao lu\*, general table of contents, one fascicle (The \*Neidian lu\* states that the sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, and biographies recorded in Changfang's catalogue total 2,146 works in 6,235 fascicles; counting the works not admitted into the canon yields 74 works in 37 fascicles, which differs from the \*Neidian lu\*).  
> The above, together with the general table of contents, forms fifteen fascicles in all (its thirteenth and fourteenth fascicles, the catalogues of Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna texts admitted into the canon, total 1,076 works in 2,325 fascicles; the original number in Changfang's catalogue of 3,392 fascicles was a calculation error). The \*Neidian lu\* states: 'In the work compiled by Changfang, earthenware and jade are intermingled among the texts admitted into the canon. Its merit lies in its rich profusion, though it cannot be fully verified; yet it is not without grounding, and ought not to be dismissed unilaterally.' (The compiler notes: Upon examining Changfang's catalogue of texts admitted into the canon, the facts and actual contents are mixed and erroneous. Lost texts as well as doubtful and spurious ones are all catalogued as canonical, which I personally consider unacceptable. Furthermore, as in the Mahāyāna catalogue, the \*Bhadrakalpika-sūtra\* and \*Bhadrakalpa-samādhi-sūtra\* are two titles for one sūtra, yet he keeps them as two works: the first error. The \*Subhūti Chapter\* and \*Chang'an Chapter\* are both alternative titles for the \*Prajñā Excerpts\*, yet he preserves them separately as two works: the second error. The \*Sujintianzi jing\* and \*Sujintianzi wen sishi jing\* are also two titles for one sūtra, yet he duplicates them as two  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 10.4.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.3)
- [Next: 10.4.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.5)
- [Up: 10.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154~en-mt.10.4.4) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (2)

- [法苑珠林](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2122.100.8) — 道世, Classical Chinese
- [貞元新定釋教目錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.18.4.4) — 圓照, Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.10.4.4) · Pramāṇa
