[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [開元釋教錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154) › 15.11 # 開元釋教錄 15.11 開元釋教錄 15.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [15.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15.11) 僧祇戒本一卷曹魏天竺沙門曇柯迦羅譯 （第一譯） 右前後兩譯一本在藏一本闕。 十誦比丘戒本一卷（或云十誦大比丘戒）苻秦西域沙門 曇摩持共竺佛念譯（第一譯） 十誦比丘戒本一卷東晉西域沙門竺曇無 蘭合出（第二譯右長房錄云太元六年曇無蘭合僧純曇摩持竺僧舒三家本以為一卷見寶 唱錄謹按群錄僧純於拘夷國得十誦尼戒梵本將來令曇摩持等譯出唯此僧純與曇摩持同是一 本其竺僧舒群錄無名不知合本從何而得未詳所以） 右兼合本前後三譯一存二闕。 比丘尼戒一卷（或云比丘尼戒經出十誦律）西晉三藏竺法 護譯（第一譯） 比丘尼大戒一卷（亦云十誦比丘尼戒）苻秦西域沙門曇 摩持共佛念等譯（第二譯） 十誦比丘尼戒所出本末一卷姚秦涼州沙 門竺佛念譯（第三譯） （右長房錄云僧純於拘夷國得梵本佛念為譯文繁後竺法汰刪改正之見寶唱錄今疑佛念譯者與曇摩持同 是尼戒所出何異而別存之）。 前後三譯其本並闕。 彌沙塞羯磨一卷（出彌沙塞律）宋罽賓三藏佛陀 什等譯（單本） 彌沙塞律抄一卷師子國沙門僧伽跋彌 譯（不知年代出寶唱錄單本附宋） 迦葉禁戒經一卷（一名摩訶比丘經一名真偽沙門經）東晉沙門 釋退公譯（第一譯） 右前後兩譯一存一闕。 優婆塞五戒經一卷（一名五相經）宋居士沮渠京 聲譯（第二譯） 右前後兩譯。一存一闕。 雜問律事二卷東晉西域沙門曇摩譯（第一 譯） 雜問律事二卷東晉罽賓沙門卑摩羅叉譯 （第二譯） 右二雜事同本異譯其本並闕（靜泰錄云。後秦曇摩蜱譯十 誦律。釋雜事問二卷。寶唱錄云。後秦罽賓沙門曇摩耶舍譯十誦律雜事一卷。此之二說多是錄家人名差誤。或 即是前第一譯者。長房內典二錄並云東晉所翻。非秦代譯。依此二錄為正。房錄又云曇摩譯者明佛法僧物互相 交涉分齊差殊甚要須善防護。今藏中有五百問事經一卷有三十三紙亦明佛法僧物不得參涉。事然名目不同 莫知所以。餘錄云出十誦律者即五百問經中明三十九夜受日等事。即與十誦符同。但以名目有殊。未為尅定。 後諸博見詳而正之）。 教授比丘尼法一卷東晉罽賓三藏瞿曇僧 伽提婆譯（單本） 教授比丘尼二歲檀文一卷（或無尼字）苻秦西域 沙門曇摩持共竺佛念譯（單本） 二百六十戒三部合異二卷（序加大比丘字）東晉西 域沙門竺曇無蘭撰 （右合戒序云。晉太元六年辛巳六月二十五日。比丘竺曇無蘭在謝鎮西寺合此三戒到七月十八日訖。故記之。又 長房內典二錄及靖邁經圖之中並云漢明帝時沙門竺法蘭譯二百六十戒合異二卷。今詳此說。理定不然。當佛 法初興。戒律未備。戒之合異從何而來。今愚見所裁只是竺曇無蘭所合之者。二人名姓俱同。錄家誤上曇無即法 還是法蘭故高僧傳法蘭所譯但標餘部無此戒名。今此錄中廢之不立。其曇無所合非是正翻。此錄之中亦不合 載。但以二說差誤。故存而記之）。 他毘利律一卷（齊言宿德律）簫齊西域三藏摩訶乘 譯（單本） 僧澀多律一卷（陳言總攝）陳天竺三藏真諦譯（單本） 遺教法律經三卷（或云遺教法律三昧。亦云遺教三昧。或二卷）西晉沙 門釋法炬譯（單本） 六齋八戒經一卷宋天竺三藏求那跋陀羅 譯（單本） 賢者律儀經一卷（亦云威儀）宋居士沮渠京聲譯 （單本） 僧名數事行一卷後漢失譯 比丘諸禁律一卷後漢失譯 摩訶僧祇律比丘要集一卷（一名摩訶僧祇部比丘隨用要集法） 後漢失譯 沙彌十戒經一卷（舊錄云沙彌戒）後漢失譯 比丘尼十戒經一卷後漢失譯 賢者五戒經一卷後漢失譯 優婆塞威儀經一卷後漢失譯 大戒經一卷魏吳失譯 衣服制經一卷魏吳失譯 沙彌離威儀一卷魏吳失譯 道本五戒經一卷魏吳失譯 威儀經一卷（法經錄中無經字）魏吳失譯 應行律一卷僧祐錄云安公失譯經（附西晉錄） 五部威儀所服經一卷（或云五部僧服經高僧傳云白法祖譯） 僧祐錄中失譯經（今附宋錄） 結界文經一卷僧祐錄中失譯經（今附宋錄） 沙彌離戒一卷僧祐錄中失譯經（今附宋錄） 五戒報應經一卷僧祐錄中失譯經（今附宋錄） > Prātimokṣa of the Mahāsāṃghika, one fascicle, translated by the śramaṇa Dharmakāla of Tianzhu under the Cao Wei > (First translation) > The above has had two translations; one text is extant in the canon and one is lost. > Bhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda, one fascicle (also called Mahābhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Zhu Fonian under the Fu Qin (First translation) > Bhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda, one fascicle, compiled and produced by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin (Second translation; the Changfang Catalogue says: In the sixth year of Taiyuan, Tanwulan combined the three versions of Sengchun, Dharmadhara, and Zhu Sengshu into one fascicle. See the Baochang Catalogue. Checking the various catalogues carefully: Sengchun obtained the Sanskrit text of the Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-prātimokṣa in Kucha and brought it back, having Dharmadhara and others translate it out. Only this Sengchun and Dharmadhara are the same text; Zhu Sengshu has no name in the various catalogues, and it is unknown where the combined version came from, its rationale being unclear) > Including the combined text, the above has had three translations; one is extant and two are lost. > Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle (also called Bhikṣuṇī-prātimokṣa Sūtra, extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya), translated by the Tripiṭaka master Dharmarakṣa under the Western Jin (First translation) > Great Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle (also called Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-śīla), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Fonian and others under the Fu Qin (Second translation) > Origin and Development of the Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle, translated by the Liangzhou śramaṇa Zhu Fonian under the Yao Qin (Third translation) > (The Changfang Catalogue says: Sengchun obtained the Sanskrit text in Kucha, and Fonian translated it for him. The text was prolix, and later Zhu Fatai abridged and corrected it; see the Baochang Catalogue. I now suspect that Fonian's translation was the same Bhikṣuṇī-śīla text as Dharmadhara's; what difference was there in its origin that it was preserved separately?) > The above three translations are all lost. > Mahīśāsaka-karman, one fascicle (extracted from the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya), translated by the Kashmir Tripiṭaka master Buddhajīva and others under the Song (Sole translation) > Extract of the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya, one fascicle, translated by the Siṃhala śramaṇa Saṅghavarman (Date unknown; listed in the Baochang Catalogue; sole translation, appended to the Song) > Kāśyapa-śīla-sūtra, one fascicle (also called Mahābhikṣu Sūtra, also called Sūtra on True and False Śramaṇas), translated by the śramaṇa Shi Tuigong under the Eastern Jin (First translation) > The above has had two translations; one is extant and one is lost. > Upāsaka-pañcaśīla-sūtra, one fascicle (also called Sūtra of the Five Marks), translated by the householder Juqu Jingsheng under the Song (Second translation) > The above has had two translations; one is extant and one is lost. > Miscellaenous Inquiries on Vinaya Matters, two fascicles, translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara under the Eastern Jin (First translation) > Miscellaneous Inquiries on Vinaya Matters, two fascicles, translated by the Kashmir śramaṇa Vimalākṣa under the Eastern Jin (Second translation) > The above two miscellaneous texts are different translations of the same text; both texts are lost. (The Jingtai Catalogue says: Dharmapī of the Later Qin translated the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya Explaining the Inquiries on Miscellaneous Matters in two fascicles. The Baochang Catalogue says: The Kashmir śramaṇa Dharmayaśas of the Later Qin translated the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya Miscellaneous Matters in one fascicle. These two accounts are mostly errors by cataloguers in persons' names, or perhaps they are the aforementioned first translation. The Changfang and Neidian catalogues both say they were translated under the Eastern Jin, not translated under the Qin dynasty; following these two catalogues is correct. The Changfang Catalogue also says: The Dharmadhara translation clarifies that the property of the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha involves each other with disparate demarcations, which is very critical and must be guarded well. Now in the canon there is the Sūtra of Five Hundred Inquiries in one fascicle of thirty-three sheets, which also clarifies that the property of the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha must not be intermingled. Although the matters are identical, their titles differ, and the reason is not known. The other catalogues' claim that it was extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya refers to the Sūtra of Five Hundred Inquiries clarifying matters such as receiving the day for thirty-nine nights, which indeed accords with the Sarvāstivāda. Yet because the titles differ, it has not been definitively settled. Let later learned persons examine and rectify it). > Method for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs, one fascicle, translated by the Kashmir Tripiṭaka master Gautama Saṅghadeva under the Eastern Jin (Sole translation) > Two-Year Dana Text for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs, one fascicle (some lack the word "Bhikṣuṇī"), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Zhu Fonian under the Fu Qin (Sole translation) > Combined Differences of the Three Recensions of the Two Hundred and Sixty Precepts, two fascicles (preface adds the words "Great Bhikṣu"), compiled by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin > (The preface to the combined precepts says: On the twenty-fifth day of the sixth month, the xinsi year, the sixth year of Taiyuan of the Jin, the bhikṣu Zhu Tanwulan collated these three sets of precepts at the Xie Zhenxi Temple, finishing on the eighteenth day of the seventh month; hence it is recorded. Furthermore, the Changfang and Neidian catalogues, as well as Jingmai's Scripture Charts, all say that during the reign of Emperor Ming of the Han, the śramaṇa Zhu Falan translated the Combined Differences of the Two Hundred and Sixty Precepts in two fascicles. Now examining this account, it is certainly not so by principle. When the Buddha-Dharma was first flourishing, the vinaya was not yet complete; where could combined differences of precepts have come from? In my humble opinion, it was merely combined by Zhu Tanwulan. Both persons share the same surname and given name; the cataloguers mistakenly took Tanwu as Fa, returning it to Falan. Thus, the Biographies of Eminent Monks lists only other works translated by Falan, with no such title of precepts. In the present catalogue, it is abolished and not retained. What Tanwu combined was not a proper translation, and should not be included in this catalogue either; but because of the error between the two accounts, it is preserved and noted here). > Sthavirīya-vinaya, one fascicle (translated in Qi as Vinaya of the Venerable Elders), translated by the Western Regions Tripiṭaka master Mahāyāna under the Southern Qi (Sole translation) > Saṃyuktaka-vinaya, one fascicle (translated in Chen as Comprehensive Summary), translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha under the Chen (Sole translation) > Sūtra on the Vinaya of Bequeathed Teachings, three fascicles (also called Samādhi on the Vinaya of Bequeathed Teachings, also called Bequeathed Teachings Samādhi; or two fascicles), translated by the śramaṇa Shi Faju under the Western Jin (Sole translation) > Sūtra on the Six Fast Days and Eight Precepts, one fascicle, translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Guṇabhadra under the Song (Sole translation) > Sūtra on the Vinaya Rules of the Worthy, one fascicle (also called Deportment), translated by the householder Juqu Jingsheng under the Song (Sole translation) > Saṅgha Classifications, Numerals, Matters, and Practices, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han > Various Prohibitory Precepts for Bhikṣus, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han > Essential Collection for Bhikṣus of the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, one fascicle (also called Rules of the Essential Collection for Daily Use of Bhikṣus of the Mahāsāṃghika School), anonymous translation of the Later Han > Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle (the old catalogue says Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera), anonymous translation of the Later Han > Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of the Śrāmaṇerī, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han > Sūtra on the Five Precepts of the Worthy, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han > Sūtra on the Deportment of the Upāsaka, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han > Great Precept Sūtra, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu > Sūtra on Rules for Robes, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu > Deportment of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu > Sūtra on the Five Precepts as the Root of the Path, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu > Deportment Sūtra, one fascicle (in the Fajing Catalogue there is no word "Sūtra"), anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu > Vinaya of What Should Be Practiced, one fascicle; the Sengyou Catalogue says it is an anonymous translation sūtra from Dao'an's list (appended to the Western Jin catalogue) > Sūtra on the Robes Worn according to the Deportment of the Five Schools, one fascicle (also called Sūtra on the Monastic Robes of the Five Schools; the Biographies of Eminent Monks says it was translated by Bo Fazu); an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue) > Sūtra of the Text on Demarcating Boundaries, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue) > Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue) > Sūtra on the Karmic Retribution of the Five Precepts, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue) > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 15.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15.10) - [Next: 15.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15.12) - [Up: 15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154~en-mt.15.11) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [貞元新定釋教目錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.25.11) — 圓照, Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.15.11) · Pramāṇa