<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.13 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [貞元新定釋教目錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157) › 27.13

# 貞元新定釋教目錄 27.13

貞元新定釋教目錄 27.13

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [27.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.13)

菩薩地持經十卷（或八卷亦名菩薩戒經又名菩薩地經）  
右一經。亦名菩薩地持論。今此錄中編之  
為律存其經名。除其論錄。中云菩薩地持  
經闕本者誤也。又周錄中此一本經既有  
多名前後差互。凡六處重上錯之甚也。  
（大乘經中一處上大乘律中二處上大乘論中一處上闕本錄中二處上）。  
餘經重載其數非一。恐繁紙墨故略述之。  
無畏德女經一卷（今編入寶積經）  
第一義法勝經一卷  
彌勒菩薩所問本願經一卷  
右三經大周入藏錄中單本重譯二處俱載  
者誤也。今除單本編重譯中。  
發菩提心經二卷（亦名發菩提心論）  
右一經。周入藏錄大乘經中及大乘論二  
處俱載者誤也。今以菩薩所造除其經名  
存於論錄。  
諫王經一卷（亦名大小諫王經）  
右一經周入藏闕本二錄俱載者誤也。  
法句經二卷（亦名法句集）  
右一經。周入藏錄大乘譯及集傳內二處  
俱載者誤也。尋文並同不可分二雖曾再  
譯一本闕無。今經中除編於集內。  
攝大乘釋論十二卷  
右一論。隋開皇仁壽二年眾經錄及唐內  
典大周錄等皆存二本。云與十五卷攝論  
同本異出。俱是陳朝三藏真諦所譯者誤  
也。今勘文句首末全同。卷雖多少有殊不  
可分為二部。但存十五卷本。十二成者除  
之。

> Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-sūtra, ten fascicles (or eight fascicles; also titled Bodhisattva-śīla-sūtra, and also titled Bodhisattvabhūmi-sūtra).  
> The one scripture above is also titled Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-śāstra. In the present catalogue, it is compiled as vinaya, retaining its scripture title and eliminating its entry as a treatise. In the catalogue, stating that the Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-sūtra lacks an extant text is an error. Furthermore, in the Zhou catalogue, this single text, having multiple titles, was confused back and forth, entered redundantly in six places in all, which is a gross error.  
> (Entered in one place among Mahāyāna scriptures, two places among Mahāyāna vinayas, one place among Mahāyāna treatises, and two places in the catalogue of lacking texts).  
> Other redundant scriptures are not few in number; fearing to waste paper and ink, they are described only briefly.  
>   
> Abhayadattā-sūtra, one fascicle (now compiled into the Ratnakūṭa-sūtra).  
> Paramārtha-dharma-vijaya-sūtra, one fascicle.  
> Maitreya-bodhisattva-paripṛcchā-pūrvapraṇidhāna-sūtra, one fascicle.  
> The three scriptures above were recorded in two places in the Great Zhou Canon Catalogue, under both single translations and retranslations, which is an error. The entries under single translations are now removed, and they are compiled among the retranslations.  
>   
> Bodhicittoppāda-sūtra, two fascicles (also titled Bodhicittoppāda-śāstra).  
> The one scripture above was recorded in two places in the Zhou Canon Catalogue, among Mahāyāna scriptures and among Mahāyāna treatises, which is an error. Now, because it was composed by a bodhisattva, its scripture title is removed and it is retained in the treatise catalogue.  
>   
> Jianwang jing, one fascicle (also titled Da xiao jianwang jing).  
> The one scripture above was recorded in both the canon and lacking-text catalogues in the Zhou \[catalogue\], which is an error.  
>   
> Dharmapada, two fascicles (also titled Dharmapada Collection).  
> The one scripture above was recorded in two places in the Zhou Canon Catalogue, under Mahāyāna translations and within anthologies and biographies, which is an error. Upon examining the texts, they are identical and cannot be divided into two. Although it was retranslated in the past, one text is lacking. It is now removed from the scriptures and compiled within the anthologies.  
>   
> Mahāyānasaṃgrahabhāṣya, twelve fascicles.  
> The one treatise above: the Kaihuang and Renshou second-year canonical catalogues of the Sui, as well as the Tang Neidian lu, the Great Zhou catalogue, and others, all preserve two texts, stating that it is an alternate translation from the same source text as the fifteen-fascicle Saṃgrahabhāṣya, and that both were translated by the Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha of the Chen dynasty, which is an error. Now, collating the phrasing from beginning to end, they are completely identical. Although there is a difference in the number of fascicles, it cannot be divided into two works. Only the fifteen-fascicle text is retained; the one made into twelve fascicles is eliminated.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 27.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.12)
- [Next: 27.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.14)
- [Up: 27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157~en-mt.27.13) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [開元釋教錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2154.17.12) — 智昇, Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2157.27.13) · Pramāṇa
