[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733) › 2.110 # 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.110 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.110 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.110](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.110) 經。言心住者即為非住乃至過去心不可得等　演曰。此初所知心通染及淨。染心共欲。與欲俱故淨心離欲。言非心住等。以住三世住染及淨名之為住。據第一義說為非住真勝義中無有染淨心住相故。此意由佛見心非心得真實理故。故能遍知。若取心相觸途生礙不能遍知眾生心也。是答前問。不爾疎略無所結歸。彼論重約能知染心說顛倒故。何所以者。以彼染心能為障礙。正是所度。是故偏說不違此論彼云如來說諸心住皆為非心住者。此句示現遠離四念處故。此以何義心住者。住彼念處以離彼念處故云不住。演曰。汎論心住自有二義。一者愚夫於境染著名住。二者賢聖觀四念處住亦名為住。今說染心離彼念住故云不住。是名為心住者。總結凡愚住於顛倒也。彼又云。又住不動根本名異義一。金剛仙釋云。以四念處栖心真如理中故名為住。不為五欲所壞。又不為二乘所壞故曰不動。能與菩提為基故名根本。演曰。三名雖異然其所詮同目念住故云名異義一。此即汎解念住異名也。新論稍別應勘彼文。 > Sūtra: “What is called mental abiding is non-abiding, \[...\] past mind cannot be apprehended, and so forth.” > Exposition: These initial minds to be known encompass both defiled and pure. Defiled minds are accompanied by desire, co-occurring with desire; pure minds are separated from desire. Saying "non-mental abiding," etc.: because they abide in the three times and abide in defilement and purity, they are called "abiding"; in terms of the paramārtha, it is spoken of as "non-abiding," for within the true supreme meaning there are no characteristics of mental abiding as defiled or pure. This means: because the Buddha sees that the mind is not mind and attains the true principle, he is able to know comprehensively. If one grasps mental marks, obstruction arises at every turn and one cannot comprehensively know the minds of sentient beings. This answers the previous question; otherwise, it would be loose and incomplete, with nowhere to conclude. That commentary focuses on the ability to know defiled minds, explaining them as inversions. Why is this? Because those defiled minds can act as obstructions and are precisely what are to be delivered; therefore, singling them out does not contradict this commentary. It says: "The Tathāgata speaks of all mental abidings as non-mental abidings; this sentence shows being far removed from the four applications of mindfulness." By what meaning is it "mental abiding"? Abiding in those applications of mindfulness; and because of being separated from those applications of mindfulness, it is called "non-abiding." Exposition: Generally discussing mental abiding, it naturally has two meanings: first, an ignorant person being defiled and attached to objects is called abiding; second, the worthy and noble abiding by observing the four applications of mindfulness is also called abiding. Here, speaking of the defiled mind, being separated from that mindful abiding is called non-abiding. "This is named mental abiding" generally concludes that ordinary fools abide in inversion. That \[commentary\] also says: "Furthermore, 'abiding', 'unmoving', and 'fundamental' have different names but one meaning." Jin'gangxian explains: "Because with the four applications of mindfulness one lodges the mind in the principle of tathatā, it is called abiding; not being destroyed by the five desires, nor being destroyed by the two vehicles, it is called unmoving; being able to serve as the foundation for bodhi, it is called fundamental." Exposition: Although the three names are different, what they signify identically refers to the application of mindfulness; hence it says "different names but one meaning." This is a general explanation of the alternative names for the application of mindfulness. The new commentary is slightly different, and one should consult that text. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.109](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.109) - [Next: 2.111](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.111) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733~en-mt.2.110) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [金剛般若波羅蜜經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1704.2.20) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.110](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.110) · Pramāṇa