[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733) › 2.13 # 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.13 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.13) 經。不應住色至味觸法生心　演曰。二別釋不住。於相令離相縛及麁重縛。由執相故。使為境相之所拘礙。於生死中生麁重縛。麁重縛者。不安隱性。不調柔性。無堪任性。身心勞倦疲之性故。有經頌云。相縛縛眾生。亦由麁重縛善雙修止觀。方乃得解脫。如觀戲調境。相拘心耽嗜。不已便生勞倦後休息已方覺疲乏。此想拘心生乏亦爾。此相縛者。體通一切三世三性。有漏境相所生。麁重亦通一切有漏之性。故說三界皆是行苦。或此文意由執色等以為實有。便起希求追戀慳惜。於流轉苦更憎疲乏。永處生死。安能發心。為遮此等故勸不住色等生心。論云。若著色等。則於流轉苦中疲乏故菩提心不生。釋文如前。願淨土解。論文云。不住非法者。謂非法無我也。於非法及法無我中皆不住故。演曰。貞觀不住六塵及非六塵。梁本及此論。但有不住前五塵無不住非五塵。其法非法即皆不住故。論逐難先解非法。然准論意。經言法者謂法無我。言非法者謂非法無我。即有法我故。總結云。於非法及法無我中皆不住故。謂於法無我及非法無我中皆不住也。 > Sūtra: One should not dwell in form \[...\] or dwell in sound, smell, taste, touch, or dharmas to give rise to the mind. / Commentary: Second, specifically explaining non-dwelling. Regarding marks, it causes one to be free from the bondage of marks and the bondage of heavy dross. Because of grasping at marks, one is hindered by the marks of objects and gives rise to the bondage of heavy dross in birth and death. The bondage of heavy dross is the nature of being uneasy, unpliant, incapable, and weary and exhausted in body and mind. A sūtra verse states: 'Sentient beings are bound by the bondage of marks / and also by the bondage of heavy dross; / only by skillfully cultivating both calming and insight / do they attain liberation.' Just as when watching theatrical plays, one's mind is captured by the marks and indulges in them; unable to stop, weariness arises, and only after resting does one perceive fatigue. The mind being bound by these conceptions and giving rise to exhaustion is just like this. This bondage of marks inherently pervades all \[dharmas of\] the three times and the three natures, generated by defiled objective marks. Heavy dross also pervades all defiled natures; therefore it is said that the three realms are all the suffering of conditioned existence. Alternatively, the meaning of this passage is: by grasping at form and the like as real entities, one gives rise to seeking, yearning, clinging, and stinginess; regarding the suffering of saṃsāra, one further increases fatigue, remaining forever in birth and death. How could one generate the mind? To prevent such things, one is exhorted not to dwell in form and the like to give rise to the mind. The treatise states: 'If one is attached to form and the like, then in the suffering of saṃsāra one becomes weary, and thus the bodhi-mind does not arise.' The explanation of the text is as before in the explanation of the aspiration for a pure land. The treatise says: 'Not dwelling in non-dharmas means the non-self of non-dharmas; because one dwells neither in non-dharmas nor in the non-self of dharmas.' The Commentary says: The Zhenguan \[version\] has 'not dwelling in the six sensory objects nor in the non-six sensory objects.' The Liang version and this treatise only have 'not dwelling in the former five sensory objects,' without 'not dwelling in the non-five sensory objects.' As for dharmas and non-dharmas, one does not dwell in either; therefore the treatise addresses the difficulty by first explaining 'non-dharmas'. However, according to the treatise's meaning, when the sūtra says 'dharmas,' it means the non-self of dharmas; when it says 'non-dharmas,' it means the non-self of non-dharmas, which is the self of dharmas. Therefore it concludes in summary: 'Because one dwells neither in non-dharmas nor in the non-self of dharmas,' which means that one dwells neither in the non-self of dharmas nor in the non-self of non-dharmas. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.12) - [Next: 2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.14) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733~en-mt.2.13) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (4) - [金剛般若經疏論纂要](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.2.19) — Classical Chinese - [金剛般若經旨贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.50) — Classical Chinese - [金剛般若波羅蜜經論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.prajnaparamita.vajracchedika!vajracchedikaprajnaparamitasastra-t1510b*zh-dharmagupta.2.72) — Classical Chinese - [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.39) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.13) · Pramāṇa